Export limit exceeded: 424998 CVEs match your query. Please refine your search to export 10,000 CVEs or fewer.
Export limit exceeded: 424998 CVEs match your query. Please refine your search to export 10,000 CVEs or fewer.
Export limit exceeded: 424998 CVEs match your query. Please refine your search to export 10,000 CVEs or fewer.
Search
Search Results (424998 CVEs found)
| CVE | Vendors | Products | Updated | CVSS v3.1 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CVE-2026-126171 | 1 Fortinet | 4 Fortianalyzer, Fortianalyzercloud, Fortimanager and 1 more | 2026-11-11 | 7.2 High |
| A use of externally-controlled format string vulnerability in Fortinet FortiAnalyzer 8.0.0 through 8.0.1, FortiAnalyzer 7.6.0 through 7.6.7, FortiAnalyzer 7.4.0 through 7.4.11, FortiAnalyzer 7.2.0 through 7.2.12, FortiAnalyzer Cloud 8.0.1, FortiAnalyzer Cloud 7.6.0 through 7.6.7, FortiAnalyzer Cloud 7.4.1 through 7.4.11, FortiAnalyzer Cloud 7.2.1 through 7.2.12, FortiManager 8.0.0 through 8.0.1, FortiManager 7.6.0 through 7.6.7, FortiManager 7.4.0 through 7.4.11, FortiManager 7.2.0 through 7.2.12, FortiManager Cloud 8.0.1, FortiManager Cloud 7.6.0 through 7.6.7, FortiManager Cloud 7.4.1 through 7.4.11, FortiManager Cloud 7.2.1 through 7.2.12 may allow an authenticated attacker to execute unauthorized commands via specially crafted HTTP request | ||||
| CVE-2026-126165 | 1 Fortinet | 1 Fortimail | 2026-11-11 | 7.5 High |
| A memory allocation with excessive size value vulnerability in Fortinet FortiMail 8.0.0 through 8.0.1, FortiMail 7.6.0 through 7.6.6, FortiMail 7.4.0 through 7.4.8, FortiMail 7.2 all versions may allow a remote unauthenticated attacker to cause a denial of service via a specially crafted attachment delivered over SMTP. | ||||
| CVE-2026-126154 | 1 Fortinet | 1 Fortimail | 2026-11-11 | 7.5 High |
| A out-of-bounds write vulnerability in Fortinet FortiMail 8.0.0 through 8.0.1, FortiMail 7.6.0 through 7.6.6, FortiMail 7.4.0 through 7.4.8, FortiMail 7.2 all versions may allow a remote unauthenticated attacker to cause a denial of service via a specially crafted HTTP request. | ||||
| CVE-2026-126148 | 1 Fortinet | 1 Fortimail | 2026-11-11 | 9.8 Critical |
| A improper neutralization of special elements used in an os command ('os command injection') vulnerability in Fortinet FortiMail 8.0.0 through 8.0.1, FortiMail 7.6.0 through 7.6.6 may allow an unauthenticated attacker to execute unauthorized code or commands via crafted HA join-request packets. | ||||
| CVE-2024-6806 | 1 Ni | 1 Veristand | 2026-11-11 | 9.8 Critical |
| The NI VeriStand Gateway is missing authorization checks when an actor attempts to access Project resources. These missing checks may result in remote code execution. This affects NI VeriStand 2024 Q2 and prior versions. | ||||
| CVE-2024-6805 | 1 Ni | 1 Veristand | 2026-11-11 | 7.5 High |
| The NI VeriStand Gateway is missing authorization checks when an actor attempts to access File Transfer resources. These missing checks may result in information disclosure or remote code execution. This affects NI VeriStand 2024 Q2 and prior versions. | ||||
| CVE-2024-6794 | 1 Ni | 1 Veristand | 2026-11-11 | 9.8 Critical |
| A deserialization of untrusted data vulnerability exists in NI VeriStand Waveform Streaming Server that may result in remote code execution. Successful exploitation requires an attacker to send a specially crafted message. These vulnerabilities affect NI VeriStand 2024 Q2 and prior versions. | ||||
| CVE-2024-6793 | 1 Ni | 1 Veristand | 2026-11-11 | 9.8 Critical |
| A deserialization of untrusted data vulnerability exists in NI VeriStand DataLogging Server that may result in remote code execution. Successful exploitation requires an attacker to send a specially crafted message. These vulnerabilities affect NI VeriStand 2024 Q2 and prior versions. | ||||
| CVE-2024-6791 | 1 Ni | 1 Veristand | 2026-11-11 | 7.8 High |
| A directory path traversal vulnerability exists when loading a vsmodel file in NI VeriStand that may result in remote code execution. Successful exploitation requires an attacker to get a user to open a specially crafted .vsmodel file. This vulnerability affects VeriStand 2024 Q2 and prior versions. | ||||
| CVE-2024-6675 | 1 Ni | 1 Veristand | 2026-11-11 | 7.8 High |
| A deserialization of untrusted data vulnerability exists in NI VeriStand that may result in remote code execution. Successful exploitation requires an attacker to get a user to open a specially crafted project file. This vulnerability affects VeriStand 2024 Q2 and prior versions. | ||||
| CVE-2024-6638 | 1 Ni | 1 Labview | 2026-11-11 | 5.5 Medium |
| An integer overflow vulnerability due to improper input validation when reading TDMS files in LabVIEW may result in an infinite loop. Successful exploitation requires an attacker to provide a user with a specially crafted TDMS file. This vulnerability affects LabVIEW 2024 Q1 and prior versions. | ||||
| CVE-2024-6122 | 1 Ni | 2 Flexlogger, Systemlink | 2026-11-11 | 5.5 Medium |
| An incorrect permission in the installation directory for the shared NI SystemLink Server KeyValueDatabase service may result in information disclosure via local access. This affects NI SystemLink Server 2024 Q1 and prior versions. It also affects NI FlexLogger 2023 Q2 and prior versions which installed this shared service. | ||||
| CVE-2024-6121 | 1 Ni | 2 Flexlogger, Systemlink | 2026-11-11 | 7.8 High |
| An out-of-date version of Redis shipped with NI SystemLink Server is susceptible to multiple vulnerabilities, including CVE-2022-24834. This affects NI SystemLink Server 2024 Q1 and prior versions. It also affects NI FlexLogger 2023 Q2 and prior versions which installed this shared service. | ||||
| CVE-2026-19697 | 1 Wordpress-extensions | 1 Gutenkit | 2026-11-11 | 6.8 Medium |
| The GutenKit WordPress plugin before 2.5.0 does not sanitise uploaded SVG files on all of the upload paths it enables, allowing users with the file upload capability, such as Author, to upload a malicious SVG and perform Stored Cross-Site Scripting attacks against any user opening it, including administrators. | ||||
| CVE-2026-19699 | 1 Wordpress-extensions | 1 Gutenkit | 2026-11-11 | 2.7 Low |
| The GutenKit WordPress plugin before 2.5.0 does not have a sufficient capability check on some of its REST API endpoints, allowing users with the Contributor role and above to retrieve mailing-list audience metadata from the site's connected marketing account. | ||||
| CVE-2026-75860 | 1 Wordpress-extensions | 1 Json Options | 2026-11-11 | 9.8 Critical |
| The JSON Options WordPress plugin through 0.0.4 does not have any capability check or nonce verification on one of its actions, which runs on every request and is available to unauthenticated users, allowing them to update arbitrary WordPress options. This can be leveraged to enable user registration and set the default role to administrator, leading to privilege escalation and full site takeover. | ||||
| CVE-2026-13736 | 1 Wordpress-extensions | 1 Newpath Wildapricotpress Add-on | 2026-11-11 | 5.3 Medium |
| The NewPath WildApricotPress Add-on WordPress plugin through 1.0.0 does not enforce its members-only field privacy on an unauthenticated REST route, allowing anonymous visitors to read member email addresses and phone numbers that are configured to be visible to members only. | ||||
| CVE-2026-15046 | 1 Wordpress-extensions | 1 Store To Woocommerce Migration | 2026-11-11 | 4.2 Medium |
| The LitExtension WordPress plugin through 1.2.5 does not verify a nonce before an administrative action that overwrites the store-migration connector's authentication token, allowing attackers to take over the connector token by tricking a logged-in administrator into clicking a crafted link (CSRF). | ||||
| CVE-2026-14187 | 1 Wordpress-extensions | 1 Tutor Lms | 2026-11-11 | 2.7 Low |
| The Tutor LMS WordPress plugin before 4.0.6 does not enforce per-object ownership checks on its course content type, allowing any user with the instructor role to read the content of private courses belonging to other instructors. | ||||
| CVE-2026-2811 | 1 Wordpress-extensions | 1 Ajaxify Comments | 2026-11-11 | 5.4 Medium |
| The Ajaxify Comments WordPress plugin before 3.2 is vulnerable to HTTP Header Injection due to insufficient input sanitization and output escaping on user-supplied data. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to inject arbitrary HTTP headers. | ||||