| CVE |
Vendors |
Products |
Updated |
CVSS v3.1 |
| Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in libsyn Libsyn Publisher Hub libsyn-podcasting.This issue affects Libsyn Publisher Hub: from n/a through <= 1.4.4. |
| Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in typps Calendarista Basic Edition calendarista-basic-edition.This issue affects Calendarista Basic Edition: from n/a through <= 3.0.2. |
| Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in nosilver4u EWWW Image Optimizer ewww-image-optimizer.This issue affects EWWW Image Optimizer: from n/a through <= 7.2.3. |
| Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in StellarWP The Events Calendar the-events-calendar.This issue affects The Events Calendar: from n/a through <= 6.3.0. |
| Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Hamid Alinia Login with phone number login-with-phone-number.This issue affects Login with phone number: from n/a through <= 1.6.93. |
| Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in andy_moyle Church Admin church-admin.This issue affects Church Admin: from n/a through <= 4.1.7. |
| Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Saleswonder Team: Tobias Builder for WooCommerce reviews shortcodes – ReviewShort woo-product-reviews-shortcode.This issue affects Builder for WooCommerce reviews shortcodes – ReviewShort: from n/a through <= 1.01.3. |
| Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in sverde1 Watermark RELOADED watermark-reloaded allows Cross Site Request Forgery.This issue affects Watermark RELOADED: from n/a through <= 1.3.5. |
| Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Manish Kumar Agarwal Change Table Prefix change-table-prefix allows Cross Site Request Forgery.This issue affects Change Table Prefix: from n/a through <= 2.0. |
| The Kcaptcha plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery in all versions up to and including 1.0.1. This is due to missing nonce validation in the plugin's settings page handler (admin/setting.php). The settings form does not include a wp_nonce_field() and the form processing code does not call wp_verify_nonce() or check_admin_referer() before saving settings to the database via $wpdb->update(). This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to modify the plugin's CAPTCHA settings (enabling or disabling CAPTCHA on login, registration, lost password, and comment forms) via a forged request, granted they can trick a site administrator into performing an action such as clicking a link. |
| The TextP2P Texting Widget plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery in all versions up to and including 1.7. This is due to missing nonce validation in the imTextP2POptionPage() function which processes settings updates. The form at line 314 does not include a wp_nonce_field(), and the POST handler at line 7 does not call check_admin_referer() or wp_verify_nonce() before processing settings changes. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to update all plugin settings including chat widget titles, messages, API credentials, colors, and reCAPTCHA configuration via a forged request, granted they can trick a site administrator into performing an action such as clicking a link. |
| The redirect implementation in curl and libcurl 5.11 through 7.19.3, when CURLOPT_FOLLOWLOCATION is enabled, accepts arbitrary Location values, which might allow remote HTTP servers to (1) trigger arbitrary requests to intranet servers, (2) read or overwrite arbitrary files via a redirect to a file: URL, or (3) execute arbitrary commands via a redirect to an scp: URL. |
| Cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in PunBB before 1.2.17 allows remote attackers to hijack the authentication of unspecified users for requests related to a logout, probably a forced logout. |
| Cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in page 34 in MODx CMS 0.9.6.1 and 0.9.6.1p1 allows remote attackers to hijack the authentication of other users for requests that modify passwords via manager/index.php. NOTE: due to the lack of details, it is not clear whether this is related to CVE-2008-5941. |
| Cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in user.php in Simplog 0.9.3.2, and possibly earlier, allows remote attackers to hijack the authentication of administrators and users for requests that change passwords. |
| Multiple cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerabilities in the management interface on the A-LINK WL54AP3 and WL54AP2 access points before firmware 1.4.2-eng1 allow remote attackers to hijack the authentication of administrators for requests that (1) modify the network configuration via certain parameters to goform/formWanTcpipSetup or (2) modify credentials via certain parameters to goform/formPasswordSetup. |
| Multiple cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerabilities in the WHM interface 11.15.0 for cPanel 11.18 before 11.18.4 and 11.22 before 11.22.3 allow remote attackers to perform unauthorized actions as cPanel administrators via requests to cpanel/whm/webmail and other unspecified vectors. |
| Cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in the xslt script in the web-based management interface on the 2wire 1701HG, 1800HW, 2071HG, and 2700HG with firmware 3.17.5, 3.7.1, 4.25.19, or 5.29.51 allows remote attackers to hijack the intranet connectivity of arbitrary users for requests that cause a denial of service (network outage) via a page parameter with a % (percent) character followed by a non-alphanumeric character. |
| Cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in am.pl in SQL-Ledger 2.8.24 allows remote attackers to hijack the authentication of arbitrary users for requests that change a password via the login, new_password, and confirm_password parameters in a preferences action. |
| Cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in the admin panel in Django 0.96 allows remote attackers to change passwords of arbitrary users via a request to admin/auth/user/1/password/. NOTE: this issue has been disputed by Debian, since product documentation includes a recommendation for a CSRF protection module that is included with the product. However, CVE considers this an issue because the default configuration does not use this module |
