| CVE |
Vendors |
Products |
Updated |
CVSS v3.1 |
| IBM API Connect 10.0.8.0 through 10.0.8.12 and 12.1.0.0 through 12.1.1.2 could allow a remote authenticated attacker to gain unauthorized administrative access to other tenants due to LDAP injection. User-supplied input is not properly neutralized in directory queries, which could change the query and grant access beyond the user's own tenant. |
| IBM API Connect 10.0.8.0 through 10.0.8.12 and 12.1.0.0 through 12.1.1.2 could allow a remote authenticated attacker to execute arbitrary code due to improper control of generation of code. A user-supplied value can influence code that the product generates, which could lead to code execution. |
| IBM API Connect 10.0.8.0 through 10.0.8.12 and 12.1.0.0 through 12.1.1.2 could allow a remote authenticated attacker to execute arbitrary code due to improper control of generation of code. |
| IBM API Connect 10.0.8.0 through 10.0.8.12 and 12.1.0.0 through 12.1.1.2 could allow a remote authenticated attacker to gain elevated privileges due to improper authentication. |
| IBM API Connect 10.0.8.0 through 10.0.8.12 and 12.1.0.0 through 12.1.1.2 could allow a remote authenticated attacker to execute arbitrary code and access sensitive information from other tenants due to insufficient input validation. Uploaded custom module content is not sufficiently validated before it is processed, which could allow code to run with access beyond the user's own tenant. |
| IBM API Connect 10.0.8.0 through 10.0.8.12 and 12.1.0.0 through 12.1.1.2 could allow a remote authenticated attacker to execute arbitrary code and perform unauthorized administrative actions due to a path traversal vulnerability. |
| IBM API Connect 10.0.8.0 through 10.0.8.12 and 12.1.0.0 through 12.1.1.2 could allow a remote authenticated attacker to execute arbitrary code due to improper control of generation of code. Input supplied by a user can influence code generated by the product, which could lead to code execution. |
| A flaw was found in BusyBox. The udhcpc6 DHCPv6 client does not properly validate the size of network options sent by a server before copying them into memory. A malicious DHCPv6 server on the local network can exploit this flaw by sending a crafted reply, triggering a stack-based buffer overflow. This vulnerability could allow an attacker to achieve arbitrary code execution with root privileges or cause a denial of service (DoS) crash. |
| A flaw was found in BusyBox. When the httpd web server processes subdirectory configuration files, an overly long index page name can trigger a stack-based buffer overflow. An attacker with permissions to write to a subdirectory configuration file could exploit this vulnerability to execute arbitrary code with elevated privileges or cause a denial of service (DoS) by crashing the server process. |
| Insufficient protection of communications in Progress WS_FTP Server versions prior to 2025.0.5 could allow a network attacker to intercept sensitive information or modify requests when unencrypted connections are used. |
| The Cargo Shipping Location for WooCommerce WordPress plugin before 6.0 does not properly restrict access to a REST API endpoint that updates order shipment statuses, relying on an attacker-controllable value for authorization, allowing unauthenticated users to manipulate order statuses and shipment metadata. |
| IBM API Connect 10.0.8.0 through 10.0.8.12 and 12.1.0.0 through 12.1.1.2 could allow arbitrary code to be executed by the management service in certain non-default configurations due to improper control of generation of code. Customization content may be evaluated as code, which is only possible where the related feature is enabled and not properly restricted. |
| Improper Control of Generation of Code ('Code Injection') vulnerability in Staggs STAGGS staggs allows Remote Code Inclusion.This issue affects STAGGS: from n/a through 3.3.0. |
| Argument injection in the Kubernetes special agent in Checkmk <2.5.0p19, <2.4.0p40, and 2.3.0 (EOL) allows a user with permission to edit rules in at least one folder to write files to arbitrary locations writable by the site user via crafted node roles in the "Exclude nodes based on their role" rule option, leading to code execution as the site user. |
| Path traversal in the discovered host label synchronization in Checkmk <2.5.0p19, <2.4.0p40 and 2.3.0 (EOL) allows an attacker in control of a remote site in a distributed monitoring setup to write arbitrary files on the central site and thereby execute code as the central site user. |
| Path traversal in the Synthetic Monitoring "Robotmk" test service of Checkmk <2.5.0p19, <2.4.0p40, and 2.3.0 (EOL) allows an attacker who controls the agent output of a monitored host's check output for a host to inject a crafted robot output to define the contents and location for the generated HTML log, leading to code execution as the site user. |
| The Pixelavo WordPress plugin before 1.5.4 registers an unauthenticated AJAX action, gated only by a nonce that it emits publicly on every front-end page, that forwards client-supplied event data to the configured Facebook Conversions API using the administrator's stored access token. This allows an unauthenticated visitor to inject arbitrary conversion events into the administrator's Facebook ads account and exhaust the configured API quota. |
| The Podlove Podcast Publisher WordPress plugin before 4.5.3 does not perform nonce validation on some of its administrative create and delete actions, allowing attackers to create rogue records or delete legitimate ones via a forged request (CSRF) when a logged-in administrator is tricked into visiting a crafted page. |
| The Booking for Appointments and Events Calendar WordPress plugin before 2.4.4 does not restrict which fields can be written through its customer import, allowing a user with the Amelia Manager role to modify arbitrary columns of any stored user record by supplying them in the import request. |
| The Pixel Tag Manager for WooCommerce WordPress plugin before 2.2.1 does not perform an authorization check on one of its AJAX actions, allowing unauthenticated users to submit forged e-commerce conversion events to the site's configured server-side advertising conversion APIs using the site's stored credentials. |
