Export limit exceeded: 423974 CVEs match your query. Please refine your search to export 10,000 CVEs or fewer.
Search
Search Results (1049 CVEs found)
| CVE | Vendors | Products | Updated | CVSS v3.1 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CVE-2026-58426 | 1 Gitea | 1 Gitea Open Source Git Server | 2026-07-06 | 9.6 Critical |
| Gitea Actions Artifacts V4 signed URL HMAC ambiguity allows cross-repository artifact read and cross-task upload-state write | ||||
| CVE-2026-12252 | 1 Nltk | 2 Nltk, Nltk/nltk | 2026-07-06 | 7.8 High |
| In nltk/nltk versions 3.9.3 and earlier, five Stanford interface classes (StanfordPOSTagger, StanfordNERTagger, StanfordParser, StanfordDependencyParser, and StanfordNeuralDependencyParser) are vulnerable to untrusted JAR code execution. These classes accept user-controllable JAR paths and execute them via the `java()` function, which invokes `subprocess.Popen()` without integrity verification. This vulnerability is identical to CVE-2026-0848, which was fixed for StanfordSegmenter by adding SHA256 verification. However, the fix was not applied to these additional classes, leaving them susceptible to arbitrary code execution when loading untrusted JAR files. | ||||
| CVE-2024-23581 | 1 Hcltech | 1 Traveler For Microsoft Outlook | 2026-06-29 | 6.7 Medium |
| The HCL Traveler for Microsoft Outlook libraries are being flagged as potentially malicious software or an unrecognized application. | ||||
| CVE-2025-0824 | 1 Hitachi | 4 Hitachi Virtual Storage Platform One Block 23, Hitachi Virtual Storage Platform One Block 24, Hitachi Virtual Storage Platform One Block 26 and 1 more | 2026-06-29 | 3.7 Low |
| Lack of validation for firmware update in Hitachi Hitachi Virtual Storage Platform One Block 23, 24, 26, 28. This issue affects Hitachi Virtual Storage Platform One Block 23, 24, 26, 28: before DKCMAIN A3-04-21-40/00, ESM A3-04-21/00. | ||||
| CVE-2026-4600 | 1 Kjur | 1 Jsrsasign | 2026-06-26 | 7.4 High |
| Versions of the package jsrsasign before 11.1.1 are vulnerable to Improper Verification of Cryptographic Signature via the DSA domain-parameter validation in KJUR.crypto.DSA.setPublic (and the related DSA/X509 verification flow in src/dsa-2.0.js). An attacker can forge DSA signatures or X.509 certificates that X509.verifySignature() accepts by supplying malicious domain parameters such as g=1, y=1, and a fixed r=1, which make the verification equation true for any hash. | ||||
| CVE-2026-40941 | 1 Cacti | 1 Cacti | 2026-06-26 | 6.5 Medium |
| Cacti is an open source performance and fault management framework. Versions 1.2.30 and prior have a package import signature validation bypass allows which allows self-signed packages. This issue has been fixed in version 1.2.31. | ||||
| CVE-2026-6331 | 1 Wolfssl | 1 Wolfssl | 2026-06-26 | 7.5 High |
| HMAC zero-length tag forgery in EVP_DigestVerifyFinal, where a zero-length tag could be accepted as valid during HMAC verification. In the OpenSSL-compatibility HMAC verify path the supplied signature length was only checked as not exceeding the MAC length, so a zero-length or otherwise truncated tag could pass verification. The fix requires the supplied tag length to exactly equal the MAC length and rejects a zero-length MAC, so a forged short or empty tag is no longer accepted. | ||||
| CVE-2026-11800 | 1 Redhat | 7 Build Keycloak, Build Of Keycloak, Data Grid and 4 more | 2026-06-26 | 8.1 High |
| A flaw was found in Keycloak. This JWT algorithm confusion vulnerability in the JWT Authorization Grant flow allows an attacker with valid client credentials to bypass signature verification. By forging an assertion, the attacker can create unauthorized access tokens. This enables the attacker to impersonate any federated user linked to the affected Identity Provider, leading to unauthorized access and potential privilege escalation. | ||||
| CVE-2026-7511 | 1 Wolfssl | 1 Wolfssl | 2026-06-26 | 7.5 High |
| PKCS7_verify signer confusion allows forged signatures, where the signer associated with a signature is not correctly bound, permitting a forged signature to be accepted. | ||||
| CVE-2026-6329 | 1 Wolfssl | 1 Wolfssl | 2026-06-26 | 6.5 Medium |
| PKCS#12 MAC verification uses an attacker-controlled comparison length, weakening the integrity check on the MAC and allowing a mismatched MAC to be accepted. The PKCS#12 verify path compared the locally computed HMAC against the MAC parsed from the PKCS#12 structure using a length taken directly from the attacker-supplied input, without first verifying that it equals the length of the digest actually produced by the configured algorithm. A truncated or zero-length stored MAC could therefore be accepted, defeating the integrity protection of the MAC. | ||||
| CVE-2026-9779 | 1 Aten | 1 Unizon | 2026-06-26 | N/A |
| ATEN Unizon doCryptoHugeFileToFile Improper Verification of Cryptographic Signature Remote Code Execution Vulnerability. This vulnerability allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code on affected installations of ATEN Unizon. Authentication is required to exploit this vulnerability. The specific flaw exists within the updateWar method. The issue results from an incorrect implementation of cryptographic signature verification. An attacker can leverage this vulnerability to execute code in the context of SYSTEM. Was ZDI-CAN-28590. | ||||
| CVE-2026-42743 | 2 Themegrill, Wordpress | 2 Masteriyo, Wordpress | 2026-06-26 | 6.5 Medium |
| Unauthenticated Broken Authentication in Masteriyo - LMS <= 2.1.8 versions. | ||||
| CVE-2026-55961 | 1 Wolfssl | 1 Wolfssl | 2026-06-25 | 7.5 High |
| wolfSSL_PKCS7_verify() returning success for a degenerate (certs-only) PKCS#7 object that contains no signer. Such an object has empty signerInfos, so the underlying signed-data verification succeeds without authenticating any content. The compatibility-layer verify path now rejects the object when no signer signature has actually been verified, so a PKCS#7 carrying no valid signature is no longer reported as verified. This is enforced regardless of the PKCS7_NOVERIFY flag, which only suppresses signer certificate chain validation and was never intended to waive the requirement that a signature exist. Only affects OpenSSL compatibility builds that call the PKCS7_verify() compatibility API on potentially degenerate PKCS#7 bundles. | ||||
| CVE-2026-46423 | 1 Rocketchat | 1 Rocket.chat | 2026-06-25 | N/A |
| Rocket.Chat is an open-source, secure, fully customizable communications platform. Prior to 8.5.0, 8.4.1, 8.3.3, 8.2.3, 8.1.4, 8.0.5, 7.13.7, and 7.10.11, Rocket.Chat's SAML service provider implementation silently skips both SAML Response and Assertion signature validation when the configured IdP certificate field is empty. The verifySignatures routine performs an early return when serviceProviderOptions.cert is falsy, which is the default state of the setting. Because provider registration only gates on the SAML "enabled" toggle and not on the presence of a certificate, an administrator who enables SAML without pasting an IdP certificate obtains a fully wired, publicly reachable SAML login endpoint that accepts unsigned or attacker-supplied assertions. This is a default-configuration authentication-bypass class: the fail-open branch is reached with no misconfiguration beyond leaving a field at its shipped default. This vulnerability is fixed in 8.5.0, 8.4.1, 8.3.3, 8.2.3, 8.1.4, 8.0.5, 7.13.7, and 7.10.11. | ||||
| CVE-2026-46349 | 1 Joinmastodon | 1 Mastodon | 2026-06-25 | 5.3 Medium |
| Mastodon is a free, open-source social network server based on ActivityPub. Prior to 4.5.10, 4.4.17, and 4.3.23, Mastodon's normalization of incoming activities signed with Linked-Data Signatures does not sufficiently protect the activities from a certain class of spoofing, allowing attackers to re-arrange a valid signed JSON-LD activity from a third-party actor to have it processed differently. This vulnerability is fixed in 4.5.10, 4.4.17, and 4.3.23. | ||||
| CVE-2026-32974 | 1 Openclaw | 1 Openclaw | 2026-06-23 | 8.6 High |
| OpenClaw before 2026.3.12 contains an authentication bypass vulnerability in Feishu webhook mode when only verificationToken is configured without encryptKey, allowing acceptance of forged events. Unauthenticated network attackers can inject forged Feishu events and trigger downstream tool execution by reaching the webhook endpoint. | ||||
| CVE-2026-49454 | 1 Sztheory | 1 Relyra | 2026-06-22 | 9.1 Critical |
| Relyra is a strict-by-default SAML 2.0 Service Provider library for Elixir and Phoenix. Versions 1.0.0 and 1.1.0 accept forged SAML signatures because SignatureValue was not cryptographically verified before the library returned a successful authentication result. The XMLDSig trust boundary was incomplete as :public_key.verify over the exclusive-C14N canonicalized SignedInfo was not performed against the configured IdP certificate's public key, DigestValue was not recomputed over the canonicalized referenced element, and canonicalize/2 remained an unused passthrough in the signature-verification path. The result was a structure-only acceptance path where document shape and trust-source rejection could succeed without proving the signature bytes. A forged SignatureValue carrying an attacker-controlled NameID could be accepted as {:ok}. This issue has been fixed in version 1.2.0. | ||||
| CVE-2026-38651 | 2 Gravitl, Netmaker | 2 Netmaker, Netmaker | 2026-06-17 | 8.2 High |
| Authentication Bypass vulnerability exists in Netmaker versions prior to 1.5.0. The VerifyHostToken function in logic/jwts.go fails to validate the JWT signature when verifying host tokens. An attacker can forge a JWT signed with any arbitrary key and use it to impersonate any host in the network, gaining access to sensitive information | ||||
| CVE-2026-22866 | 2 Ens.domains, Ensdomains | 2 Ethereum Name Service, Ens-contracts | 2026-06-17 | 7.5 High |
| Ethereum Name Service (ENS) is a distributed, open, and extensible naming system based on the Ethereum blockchain. In versions 1.6.2 and prior, the `RSASHA256Algorithm` and `RSASHA1Algorithm` contracts fail to validate PKCS#1 v1.5 padding structure when verifying RSA signatures. The contracts only check if the last 32 (or 20) bytes of the decrypted signature match the expected hash. This enables Bleichenbacher's 2006 signature forgery attack against DNS zones using RSA keys with low public exponents (e=3). Two ENS-supported TLDs (.cc and .name) use e=3 for their Key Signing Keys, allowing any domain under these TLDs to be fraudulently claimed on ENS without DNS ownership. Apatch was merged at commit c76c5ad0dc9de1c966443bd946fafc6351f87587. Possible workarounds include deploying the patched contracts and pointing DNSSECImpl.setAlgorithm to the deployed contract. | ||||
| CVE-2022-3322 | 1 Cloudflare | 1 Warp Mobile Client | 2026-06-17 | 6.7 Medium |
| Lock Warp switch is a feature of Zero Trust platform which, when enabled, prevents users of enrolled devices from disabling WARP client. Due to insufficient policy verification by WARP iOS client, this feature could be bypassed by using the "Disable WARP" quick action. | ||||