Export limit exceeded: 424950 CVEs match your query. Please refine your search to export 10,000 CVEs or fewer.
Search
Search Results (9996 CVEs found)
| CVE | Vendors | Products | Updated | CVSS v3.1 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CVE-2025-58272 | 2 Ntt-east, Ntt-west | 2 Web Caster, Web Caster | 2026-04-15 | N/A |
| Cross-site request forgery vulnerability exists in Web Caster V130 versions 1.08 and earlier. If a logged-in user views a malicious page created by an attacker, the settings of the product may be unintentionally changed. | ||||
| CVE-2024-11812 | 1 Wordpress | 1 Wordpress | 2026-04-15 | 6.1 Medium |
| The Wtyczka SeoPilot dla WP plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery in all versions up to, and including, 3.3.091. This is due to missing or incorrect nonce validation on the SeoPilot_Admin_Options() function. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to update settings and inject malicious web scripts via a forged request granted they can trick a site administrator into performing an action such as clicking on a link. | ||||
| CVE-2023-52212 | 2 Automattic, Wordpress | 2 Wp Job Manager, Wordpress | 2026-04-15 | 5.4 Medium |
| Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Automattic WP Job Manager allows Cross Site Request Forgery.This issue affects WP Job Manager: from n/a through 2.0.0. | ||||
| CVE-2024-7850 | 2 Dontdream, Wordpress | 2 Bp Profile Search, Wordpress | 2026-04-15 | 6.1 Medium |
| The BP Profile Search plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery in all versions up to, and including, 5.7.5. This is due to missing or incorrect nonce validation on the bps_ajax_field_selector(), bps_ajax_template_options(), and bps_ajax_field_row() functions. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to inject malicious web scripts via a forged request granted they can trick a site administrator into performing an action such as clicking on a link. | ||||
| CVE-2025-64482 | 1 Enalean | 1 Tuleap | 2026-04-15 | 4.6 Medium |
| Tuleap is an Open Source Suite to improve management of software developments and collaboration. Tuleap Community Edition prior to version 16.13.99.1762267347 and Tuleap Enterprise Edition prior to versions 17.01-, 16.13-6, and 16.12-9 don't have cross-site request forgery protections in the file release system. An attacker could use this vulnerability to trick victims into changing the commit rules or immutable tags of a SVN repo. Tuleap Community Edition 16.13.99.1762267347, Tuleap Enterprise Edition 17.0-1, Tuleap Enterprise Edition 16.13-6, and Tuleap Enterprise Edition 16.12-9 fix the issue. | ||||
| CVE-2025-48099 | 2 Codeamp, Wordpress | 2 Search & Filter, Wordpress | 2026-04-15 | 4.7 Medium |
| Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Code Amp Search & Filter search-filter allows Cross Site Request Forgery.This issue affects Search & Filter: from n/a through <= 1.2.17. | ||||
| CVE-2024-2741 | 2026-04-15 | 7.1 High | ||
| Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Planet IGS-4215-16T2S, affecting firmware version 1.305b210528. This vulnerability could allow a remote attacker to trick some authenticated users into performing actions in their session, such as adding or updating accounts through the Switch web interface. | ||||
| CVE-2025-0807 | 2026-04-15 | 4.3 Medium | ||
| The CITS Support svg, webp Media and TTF,OTF File Upload, Use Custom Fonts plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery in all versions up to, and including, 4.2. This is due to missing or incorrect nonce validation on the cits_settings_tab() function. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to update the plugin's settings via a forged request granted they can trick a site administrator into performing an action such as clicking on a link. | ||||
| CVE-2025-7379 | 1 Asustor | 2 Adm, Datasync Center | 2026-04-15 | N/A |
| A security bypass vulnerability allows exploitation via Reverse Tabnabbing, a type of phishing attack where attackers can manipulate the content of the original tab, leading to credential theft and other security risks. This issue affects DataSync Center: from 1.1.0 before 1.1.0.r207, and from 1.2.0 before 1.2.0.r206. | ||||
| CVE-2024-3825 | 2026-04-15 | 4.3 Medium | ||
| Versions of the BlazeMeter Jenkins plugin prior to 4.22 contain a flaw which results in credential enumeration | ||||
| CVE-2024-0613 | 1 Wordpress | 1 Wordpress | 2026-04-15 | 6.1 Medium |
| The Delete Custom Fields plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery in all versions up to, and including, 0.3.1. This is due to missing or incorrect nonce validation on the ajax_delete_field() function. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to delete arbitrary post meta data via a forged request granted they can trick a site administrator into performing an action such as clicking on a link. | ||||
| CVE-2025-62986 | 1 Wordpress | 1 Wordpress | 2026-04-15 | 7.1 High |
| Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in FanBridge FanBridge signup fanbridge-signup allows Stored XSS.This issue affects FanBridge signup: from n/a through <= 0.6. | ||||
| CVE-2024-23597 | 2026-04-15 | 4.3 Medium | ||
| Cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability exists in TvRock 0.9t8a. If a logged-in user of TVRock accesses a specially crafted page, unintended operations may be performed. Note that the developer was unreachable, therefore, users should consider stop using TvRock 0.9t8a. | ||||
| CVE-2024-45504 | 2026-04-15 | 6.5 Medium | ||
| Cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in multiple Alps System Integration products and the OEM products allow a remote unauthenticated attacker to hijack the authentication of the user and to perform unintended operations if the user views a malicious page while logged in. | ||||
| CVE-2024-9365 | 2026-04-15 | N/A | ||
| A Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in polyaxon/polyaxon v2.4.0 allows attackers to perform unauthorized actions in the context of the victim's browser. This includes creating projects, model versions, and artifact versions, or changing settings. The impact of this vulnerability includes potential data loss and service disruption. | ||||
| CVE-2024-23736 | 3 Bitbucket, Confluence, Jira | 3 Snotify, Snotify, Snotify | 2026-04-15 | 8.8 High |
| Cross Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in savignano S/Notify before 4.0.2 for Confluence allows attackers to manipulate a user's S/MIME certificate of PGP key via malicious link or email. | ||||
| CVE-2024-13710 | 1 Wordpress | 1 Wordpress | 2026-04-15 | 4.3 Medium |
| The Estatebud – Properties & Listings plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery in all versions up to, and including, 5.5.0. This is due to missing or incorrect nonce validation on the 'estatebud_settings' page. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to update the plugin's settings via a forged request granted they can trick a site administrator into performing an action such as clicking on a link. | ||||
| CVE-2018-25127 | 2026-04-15 | 5.3 Medium | ||
| SOCA Access Control System 180612 contains a cross-site request forgery vulnerability that allows attackers to perform administrative actions without proper request validation. Attackers can craft malicious web pages that submit forged requests to create admin accounts by tricking logged-in users into visiting a malicious site. | ||||
| CVE-2023-50923 | 2026-04-15 | 4.3 Medium | ||
| In QUIC in RFC 9000, the Latency Spin Bit specification (section 17.4) does not strictly constrain the bit value when the feature is disabled, which might allow remote attackers to construct a covert channel with data represented as changes to the bit value. NOTE: The "Sheridan, S., Keane, A. (2015). In Proceedings of the 14th European Conference on Cyber Warfare and Security (ECCWS), University of Hertfordshire, Hatfield, UK." paper says "Modern Internet communication protocols provide an almost infinite number of ways in which data can be hidden or embed whithin seemingly normal network traffic." | ||||
| CVE-2020-36918 | 2026-04-15 | 4.3 Medium | ||
| iDS6 DSSPro Digital Signage System 6.2 contains a cross-site request forgery vulnerability that allows attackers to perform administrative actions without request validation. Attackers can craft malicious web pages to trick logged-in administrators into adding unauthorized users by exploiting the lack of CSRF protections. | ||||