Export limit exceeded: 110544 CVEs match your query. Please refine your search to export 10,000 CVEs or fewer.
Search
Search Results (97 CVEs found)
| CVE | Vendors | Products | Updated | CVSS v3.1 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CVE-2008-1718 | 2 Autonomy, Ibm | 2 Keyview, Lotus Notes | 2026-04-23 | N/A |
| Buffer overflow in mimesr.dll in Autonomy (formerly Verity) KeyView, as used in IBM Lotus Notes before 8.0, might allow user-assisted remote attackers to execute arbitrary code via an e-mail message with a crafted Text mail (MIME) attachment. | ||||
| CVE-2008-0862 | 1 Ibm | 1 Lotus Notes | 2026-04-23 | N/A |
| IBM Lotus Notes 6.0, 6.5, 7.0, and 8.0 signs an unsigned applet when a user forwards an email message to another user, which allows user-assisted remote attackers to bypass Execution Control List (ECL) protection. | ||||
| CVE-2007-5544 | 1 Ibm | 2 Lotus Domino, Lotus Notes | 2026-04-23 | 7.8 High |
| IBM Lotus Notes before 6.5.6, and 7.x before 7.0.3; and Domino before 6.5.5 FP3, and 7.x before 7.0.2 FP1; uses weak permissions (Everyone:Full Control) for memory mapped files (shared memory) in IPC, which allows local users to obtain sensitive information, or inject Lotus Script or other character sequences into a session. | ||||
| CVE-2009-0306 | 2 Ibm, Rim | 2 Lotus Notes Intellisync, Blackberry Desktop Software | 2026-04-23 | N/A |
| Buffer overflow in the IBM Lotus Notes Intellisync ActiveX control in lnresobject.dll in BlackBerry Desktop Manager in Research In Motion (RIM) BlackBerry Desktop Software before 5.0.1 allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code via a crafted web page. NOTE: some of these details are obtained from third party information. | ||||
| CVE-2006-0120 | 1 Ibm | 3 Lotus Domino, Lotus Domino Enterprise Server, Lotus Notes | 2026-04-16 | N/A |
| Multiple unspecified vulnerabilities in IBM Lotus Notes and Domino Server before 6.5.5 allow attackers to cause a denial of service (application crash) via multiple vectors, involving (1) a malformed message sent to an "Out Of Office" agent (SPR LPEE6DMQWJ), (2) the compact command (RTIN5U2SAJ), (3) malformed bitmap images (MYAA6FH5HW), (4) the "Delete Attachment" action (YPHG6844LD), (5) parsing certificates from a remote Certificate Table (AELE6DZFJW), and (6) creating a SSL key ring with the Domino Administration client (NSUA4FQPTN). | ||||
| CVE-2004-0480 | 1 Ibm | 1 Lotus Notes | 2026-04-16 | N/A |
| Argument injection vulnerability in IBM Lotus Notes 6.0.3 and 6.5 allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code via a notes: URI that uses a UNC network share pathname to provide an alternate notes.ini configuration file to notes.exe. | ||||
| CVE-2006-0121 | 1 Ibm | 3 Lotus Domino, Lotus Domino Enterprise Server, Lotus Notes | 2026-04-16 | N/A |
| Multiple memory leaks in IBM Lotus Notes and Domino Server before 6.5.5 allow attackers to cause a denial of service (memory consumption and crash) via unknown vectors related to (1) unspecified vectors during the SSL handshake (SPR# MKIN67MQVW), (2) the stash file during the SSL handshake (SPR# MKIN693QUT), and possibly other vectors. NOTE: due to insufficient information in the original vendor advisory, it is not clear whether there is an attacker role in other memory leaks that are specified in the advisory. | ||||
| CVE-2006-0118 | 1 Ibm | 3 Lotus Domino, Lotus Domino Enterprise Server, Lotus Notes | 2026-04-16 | N/A |
| Unspecified vulnerability in IBM Lotus Notes and Domino Server before 6.5.5, when running on AIX, allows attackers to cause a denial of service (deep recursion leading to stack overflow and crash) via long formulas. | ||||
| CVE-2001-1504 | 1 Ibm | 1 Lotus Notes | 2026-04-16 | N/A |
| Lotus Notes R5 Client 4.6 allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary commands via a Lotus Notes object with code in an event, which is automatically executed when the user processes the e-mail message. | ||||
| CVE-2006-0119 | 1 Ibm | 3 Lotus Domino, Lotus Domino Enterprise Server, Lotus Notes | 2026-04-16 | N/A |
| Multiple unspecified vulnerabilities in IBM Lotus Notes and Domino Server before 6.5.5 have unknown impact and attack vectors, due to "potential security issues" as identified by SPR numbers (1) GPKS6C9J67 in Agents, (2) JGAN6B6TZ3 and (3) KSPR699NBP in the Router, (4) GPKS5YQGPT in Security, or (5) HSAO6BNL6Y in the Web Server. NOTE: vector 3 is related to an issue in NROUTER in IBM Lotus Notes and Domino Server before 6.5.4 FP1, 6.5.5, and 7.0, which allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (CPU consumption) via a crafted vCal meeting request sent via SMTP (aka SPR# KSPR699NBP). | ||||
| CVE-2006-0117 | 1 Ibm | 3 Lotus Domino, Lotus Domino Enterprise Server, Lotus Notes | 2026-04-16 | N/A |
| Buffer overflow in IBM Lotus Notes and Domino Server before 6.5.5 allows attackers to cause a denial of service (router crash or hang) via unspecified vectors involving "CD to MIME Conversion". | ||||
| CVE-2005-2454 | 1 Ibm | 1 Lotus Notes | 2026-04-16 | N/A |
| IBM Lotus Notes 6.5.4 and 6.5.5, and 7.0.0 and 7.0.1, uses insecure default permissions (Everyone/Full Control) for the "Notes" folder and all children, which allows local users to gain privileges and modify, add, or delete files in that folder. | ||||
| CVE-2002-0370 | 5 Allume Systems Division, Ibm, Microsoft and 2 more | 7 Stuffit Expander, Lotus Notes, Windows 98 Plus Pack and 4 more | 2026-04-16 | N/A |
| Buffer overflow in the ZIP capability for multiple products allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service or execute arbitrary code via ZIP files containing entries with long filenames, including (1) Microsoft Windows 98 with Plus! Pack, (2) Windows XP, (3) Windows ME, (4) Lotus Notes R4 through R6 (pre-gold), (5) Verity KeyView, and (6) Stuffit Expander before 7.0. | ||||
| CVE-2005-2618 | 2 Autonomy, Ibm | 4 Keyview Export Sdk, Keyview Filter Sdk, Keyview Viewer Sdk and 1 more | 2026-04-16 | N/A |
| Multiple stack-based buffer overflows in Autonomy (formerly Verity) KeyView SDK before 9.2.0, as used in Lotus Notes 6.5.4 and 7.0, allow remote attackers to execute arbitrary code via (1) a UUE file containing an encoded file with a long filename handled by uudrdr.dll, (2) a compressed ZIP file with a long filename handled by kvarcve.dll, (3) a TAR archive with a long filename that is extracted to a directory with a long path handled by the TAR reader (tarrdr.dll), (4) an email that contains a long HTTP, FTP, or // link handled by the HTML speed reader (htmsr.dll) or (5) an email containing a crafted long link handled by the HTML speed reader (htmsr.dll). | ||||
| CVE-2005-1442 | 1 Ibm | 1 Lotus Notes | 2026-04-16 | N/A |
| Buffer overflow in the Lotus Notes client for Domino 6.5 before 6.5.4 and 6.0 before 6.0.5 allows local users to cause a denial of service (client crash) and possibly execute arbitrary code via the NOTES.INI file. | ||||
| CVE-2000-1138 | 1 Ibm | 1 Lotus Notes | 2026-04-16 | N/A |
| Lotus Notes R5 client R5.0.5 and earlier does not properly warn users when an S/MIME email message has been modified, which could allow an attacker to modify the email in transit without being detected. | ||||
| CVE-2003-0179 | 1 Ibm | 2 Lotus Domino Web Server, Lotus Notes Client | 2026-04-16 | N/A |
| Buffer overflow in the COM Object Control Handler for Lotus Domino 6.0.1 and earlier allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code via multiple attack vectors, as demonstrated using the InitializeUsingNotesUserName method in the iNotes ActiveX control. | ||||
| CVE-2005-1405 | 1 Ibm | 1 Lotus Notes | 2026-04-16 | N/A |
| HTTP response splitting vulnerability in the @SetHTTPHeader function in Lotus Domino 6.5.x before 6.5.4 and 6.0.x before 6.0.5 allows attackers to poison the web cache via malicious applications. | ||||
| CVE-1999-0429 | 1 Ibm | 1 Lotus Notes | 2026-04-16 | N/A |
| The Lotus Notes 4.5 client may send a copy of encrypted mail in the clear across the network if the user does not set the "Encrypt Saved Mail" preference. | ||||
| CVE-2003-0123 | 1 Ibm | 2 Lotus Domino, Lotus Notes Client | 2026-04-16 | N/A |
| Buffer overflow in Web Retriever client for Lotus Notes/Domino R4.5 through R6 allows remote malicious web servers to cause a denial of service (crash) via a long HTTP status line. | ||||