Export limit exceeded: 425880 CVEs match your query. Please refine your search to export 10,000 CVEs or fewer.
Export limit exceeded: 425880 CVEs match your query. Please refine your search to export 10,000 CVEs or fewer.
Search
Search Results (29318 CVEs found)
| CVE | Vendors | Products | Updated | CVSS v3.1 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CVE-2025-20222 | 1 Cisco | 2 Adaptive Security Appliance Software, Firepower Threat Defense Software | 2026-04-15 | 8.6 High |
| A vulnerability in the RADIUS proxy feature for the IPsec VPN feature of Cisco Secure Firewall Adaptive Security Appliance (ASA) Software and Cisco Secure Firewall Threat Defense (FTD) Software could allow an unauthenticated, remote attacker to cause a denial of service (DoS) condition. This vulnerability is due to improper processing of IPv6 packets. An attacker could exploit this vulnerability by sending IPv6 packets over an IPsec VPN connection to an affected device. A successful exploit could allow the attacker to trigger a reload of the device, resulting in a DoS condition. | ||||
| CVE-2025-48517 | 1 Amd | 2 Epyc 9005 Series Processors, Epyc Embedded 9005 Series Processors | 2026-04-15 | N/A |
| Insufficient Granularity of Access Control in SEV firmware could allow a privileged user with a malicious hypervisor to create a SEV-ES guest with an ASID in the range meant for SEV-SNP guests potentially resulting in a partial loss of confidentiality. | ||||
| CVE-2024-48871 | 1 Planet Technology Corp | 1 Wgs-804hpt Firmware | 2026-04-15 | 9.8 Critical |
| The affected product is vulnerable to a stack-based buffer overflow. An unauthenticated attacker could send a malicious HTTP request that the webserver fails to properly check input size before copying data to the stack, potentially allowing remote code execution. | ||||
| CVE-2024-44067 | 1 Alibaba | 2 T-head Xuantie C910, T-head Xuantie C920 | 2026-04-15 | 8.4 High |
| The T-Head XuanTie C910 CPU in the TH1520 SoC and the T-Head XuanTie C920 CPU in the SOPHON SG2042 have instructions that allow unprivileged attackers to write to arbitrary physical memory locations, aka GhostWrite. | ||||
| CVE-2025-29779 | 2026-04-15 | N/A | ||
| Post-Quantum Secure Feldman's Verifiable Secret Sharing provides a Python implementation of Feldman's Verifiable Secret Sharing (VSS) scheme. In versions 0.8.0b2 and prior, the `secure_redundant_execution` function in feldman_vss.py attempts to mitigate fault injection attacks by executing a function multiple times and comparing results. However, several critical weaknesses exist. Python's execution environment cannot guarantee true isolation between redundant executions, the constant-time comparison implementation in Python is subject to timing variations, the randomized execution order and timing provide insufficient protection against sophisticated fault attacks, and the error handling may leak timing information about partial execution results. These limitations make the protection ineffective against targeted fault injection attacks, especially from attackers with physical access to the hardware. A successful fault injection attack could allow an attacker to bypass the redundancy check mechanisms, extract secret polynomial coefficients during share generation or verification, force the acceptance of invalid shares during verification, and/or manipulate the commitment verification process to accept fraudulent commitments. This undermines the core security guarantees of the Verifiable Secret Sharing scheme. As of time of publication, no patched versions of Post-Quantum Secure Feldman's Verifiable Secret Sharing exist, but other mitigations are available. Long-term remediation requires reimplementing the security-critical functions in a lower-level language like Rust. Short-term mitigations include deploying the software in environments with physical security controls, increasing the redundancy count (from 5 to a higher number) by modifying the source code, adding external verification of cryptographic operations when possible, considering using hardware security modules (HSMs) for key operations. | ||||
| CVE-2025-61553 | 1 Bitvisor | 1 Bitvisor | 2026-04-15 | 8.2 High |
| An out-of-bounds write in VirtIO network device emulation in BitVisor from commit 108df6 (2020-05-20) to commit 480907 (2025-07-06) allows local attackers to cause a denial of service (host hypervisor crash) via a crafted PCI configuration space access. Given it's a heap overflow in a privileged hypervisor context, exploitation may enable arbitrary code execution or guest-to-host privilege escalation. | ||||
| CVE-2025-54461 | 1 Neojapan | 1 Chatluck | 2026-04-15 | N/A |
| ChatLuck contains an insufficient granularity of access control vulnerability in Invitation of Guest Users. If exploited, an uninvited guest user may register itself as a guest user. | ||||
| CVE-2025-66559 | 1 Taiko | 1 Taiko-mono | 2026-04-15 | N/A |
| Taiko Alethia is an Ethereum-equivalent, permissionless, based rollup designed to scale Ethereum without compromising its fundamental properties. In 2.3.1 and earlier, TaikoInbox._verifyBatches (packages/protocol/contracts/layer1/based/TaikoInbox.sol:627-678) advanced the local tid to whatever transition matched the current blockHash before knowing whether that batch would actually be verified. When the loop later broke (e.g., cooldown window not yet passed or transition invalidated), the function still wrote that newer tid into batches[lastVerifiedBatchId].verifiedTransitionId after decrementing batchId. Result: the last verified batch could end up pointing at a transition index from the next batch (often zeroed), corrupting the verified chain pointer. | ||||
| CVE-2025-23283 | 1 Nvidia | 1 Gpu Display Driver | 2026-04-15 | 7.8 High |
| NVIDIA vGPU software for Linux-style hypervisors contains a vulnerability in the Virtual GPU Manager, where a malicious guest could cause stack buffer overflow. A successful exploit of this vulnerability might lead to code execution, denial of service, escalation of privileges, information disclosure, or data tampering. | ||||
| CVE-2025-23278 | 1 Nvidia | 1 Gpu Display Driver | 2026-04-15 | 7.1 High |
| NVIDIA Display Driver for Windows and Linux contains a vulnerability where an attacker might cause an improper index validation by issuing a call with crafted parameters. A successful exploit of this vulnerability might lead to data tampering or denial of service. | ||||
| CVE-2025-24812 | 2026-04-15 | 6.5 Medium | ||
| A vulnerability has been identified in SIMATIC S7-1200 CPU 1211C AC/DC/Rly (6ES7211-1BE40-0XB0) (All versions < V4.7), SIMATIC S7-1200 CPU 1211C DC/DC/DC (6ES7211-1AE40-0XB0) (All versions < V4.7), SIMATIC S7-1200 CPU 1211C DC/DC/Rly (6ES7211-1HE40-0XB0) (All versions < V4.7), SIMATIC S7-1200 CPU 1212C AC/DC/Rly (6ES7212-1BE40-0XB0) (All versions < V4.7), SIMATIC S7-1200 CPU 1212C DC/DC/DC (6ES7212-1AE40-0XB0) (All versions < V4.7), SIMATIC S7-1200 CPU 1212C DC/DC/Rly (6ES7212-1HE40-0XB0) (All versions < V4.7), SIMATIC S7-1200 CPU 1212FC DC/DC/DC (6ES7212-1AF40-0XB0) (All versions < V4.7), SIMATIC S7-1200 CPU 1212FC DC/DC/Rly (6ES7212-1HF40-0XB0) (All versions < V4.7), SIMATIC S7-1200 CPU 1214C AC/DC/Rly (6ES7214-1BG40-0XB0) (All versions < V4.7), SIMATIC S7-1200 CPU 1214C DC/DC/DC (6ES7214-1AG40-0XB0) (All versions < V4.7), SIMATIC S7-1200 CPU 1214C DC/DC/Rly (6ES7214-1HG40-0XB0) (All versions < V4.7), SIMATIC S7-1200 CPU 1214FC DC/DC/DC (6ES7214-1AF40-0XB0) (All versions < V4.7), SIMATIC S7-1200 CPU 1214FC DC/DC/Rly (6ES7214-1HF40-0XB0) (All versions < V4.7), SIMATIC S7-1200 CPU 1215C AC/DC/Rly (6ES7215-1BG40-0XB0) (All versions < V4.7), SIMATIC S7-1200 CPU 1215C DC/DC/DC (6ES7215-1AG40-0XB0) (All versions < V4.7), SIMATIC S7-1200 CPU 1215C DC/DC/Rly (6ES7215-1HG40-0XB0) (All versions < V4.7), SIMATIC S7-1200 CPU 1215FC DC/DC/DC (6ES7215-1AF40-0XB0) (All versions < V4.7), SIMATIC S7-1200 CPU 1215FC DC/DC/Rly (6ES7215-1HF40-0XB0) (All versions < V4.7), SIMATIC S7-1200 CPU 1217C DC/DC/DC (6ES7217-1AG40-0XB0) (All versions < V4.7), SIPLUS S7-1200 CPU 1212 AC/DC/RLY (6AG1212-1BE40-2XB0) (All versions < V4.7), SIPLUS S7-1200 CPU 1212 AC/DC/RLY (6AG1212-1BE40-4XB0) (All versions < V4.7), SIPLUS S7-1200 CPU 1212 DC/DC/RLY (6AG1212-1HE40-2XB0) (All versions < V4.7), SIPLUS S7-1200 CPU 1212 DC/DC/RLY (6AG1212-1HE40-4XB0) (All versions < V4.7), SIPLUS S7-1200 CPU 1212C DC/DC/DC (6AG1212-1AE40-2XB0) (All versions < V4.7), SIPLUS S7-1200 CPU 1212C DC/DC/DC (6AG1212-1AE40-4XB0) (All versions < V4.7), SIPLUS S7-1200 CPU 1212C DC/DC/DC RAIL (6AG2212-1AE40-1XB0) (All versions < V4.7), SIPLUS S7-1200 CPU 1214 AC/DC/RLY (6AG1214-1BG40-2XB0) (All versions < V4.7), SIPLUS S7-1200 CPU 1214 AC/DC/RLY (6AG1214-1BG40-4XB0) (All versions < V4.7), SIPLUS S7-1200 CPU 1214 AC/DC/RLY (6AG1214-1BG40-5XB0) (All versions < V4.7), SIPLUS S7-1200 CPU 1214 DC/DC/DC (6AG1214-1AG40-2XB0) (All versions < V4.7), SIPLUS S7-1200 CPU 1214 DC/DC/DC (6AG1214-1AG40-4XB0) (All versions < V4.7), SIPLUS S7-1200 CPU 1214 DC/DC/DC (6AG1214-1AG40-5XB0) (All versions < V4.7), SIPLUS S7-1200 CPU 1214 DC/DC/RLY (6AG1214-1HG40-2XB0) (All versions < V4.7), SIPLUS S7-1200 CPU 1214 DC/DC/RLY (6AG1214-1HG40-4XB0) (All versions < V4.7), SIPLUS S7-1200 CPU 1214 DC/DC/RLY (6AG1214-1HG40-5XB0) (All versions < V4.7), SIPLUS S7-1200 CPU 1214C DC/DC/DC RAIL (6AG2214-1AG40-1XB0) (All versions < V4.7), SIPLUS S7-1200 CPU 1214FC DC/DC/DC (6AG1214-1AF40-5XB0) (All versions < V4.7), SIPLUS S7-1200 CPU 1214FC DC/DC/RLY (6AG1214-1HF40-5XB0) (All versions < V4.7), SIPLUS S7-1200 CPU 1215 AC/DC/RLY (6AG1215-1BG40-2XB0) (All versions < V4.7), SIPLUS S7-1200 CPU 1215 AC/DC/RLY (6AG1215-1BG40-4XB0) (All versions < V4.7), SIPLUS S7-1200 CPU 1215 AC/DC/RLY (6AG1215-1BG40-5XB0) (All versions < V4.7), SIPLUS S7-1200 CPU 1215 DC/DC/DC (6AG1215-1AG40-2XB0) (All versions < V4.7), SIPLUS S7-1200 CPU 1215 DC/DC/DC (6AG1215-1AG40-4XB0) (All versions < V4.7), SIPLUS S7-1200 CPU 1215 DC/DC/RLY (6AG1215-1HG40-2XB0) (All versions < V4.7), SIPLUS S7-1200 CPU 1215 DC/DC/RLY (6AG1215-1HG40-4XB0) (All versions < V4.7), SIPLUS S7-1200 CPU 1215 DC/DC/RLY (6AG1215-1HG40-5XB0) (All versions < V4.7), SIPLUS S7-1200 CPU 1215C DC/DC/DC (6AG1215-1AG40-5XB0) (All versions < V4.7), SIPLUS S7-1200 CPU 1215FC DC/DC/DC (6AG1215-1AF40-5XB0) (All versions < V4.7). Affected devices do not process correctly certain special crafted packets sent to port 102/tcp, which could allow an attacker to cause a denial of service in the device. | ||||
| CVE-2024-45162 | 1 Blu-castle | 1 Bcum221e | 2026-04-15 | 9.8 Critical |
| A stack-based buffer overflow issue was discovered in the phddns client in Blu-Castle BCUM221E 1.0.0P220507 via the password field. | ||||
| CVE-2025-1836 | 2026-04-15 | 4.3 Medium | ||
| A vulnerability was found in Incorta 2023.4.3. It has been classified as problematic. Affected is an unknown function of the component Edit Insight Handler. The manipulation of the argument Service Name leads to csv injection. It is possible to launch the attack remotely. The vendor was contacted early about this disclosure but did not respond in any way. | ||||
| CVE-2025-23301 | 1 Nvidia | 5 Dgx, Dgx-1, Dgx-2 and 2 more | 2026-04-15 | 4.2 Medium |
| NVIDIA HGX and DGX contain a vulnerability where a misconfiguration of the VBIOS could enable an attacker to set an unsafe debug access level. A successful exploit of this vulnerability might lead to denial of service. | ||||
| CVE-2025-2851 | 2026-04-15 | 8 High | ||
| A vulnerability classified as critical has been found in GL.iNet GL-A1300 Slate Plus, GL-AR300M16 Shadow, GL-AR300M Shadow, GL-AR750 Creta, GL-AR750S-EXT Slate, GL-AX1800 Flint, GL-AXT1800 Slate AX, GL-B1300 Convexa-B, GL-B3000 Marble, GL-BE3600 Slate 7, GL-E750, GL-E750V2 Mudi, GL-MT300N-V2 Mango, GL-MT1300 Beryl, GL-MT2500 Brume 2, GL-MT3000 Beryl AX, GL-MT6000 Flint 2, GL-SFT1200 Opal, GL-X300B Collie, GL-X750 Spitz, GL-X3000 Spitz AX, GL-XE300 Puli and GL-XE3000 Puli AX 4.x. Affected is an unknown function of the file plugins.so of the component RPC Handler. The manipulation leads to buffer overflow. It is recommended to upgrade the affected component. | ||||
| CVE-2025-20244 | 1 Cisco | 2 Adaptive Security Appliance Software, Firepower Threat Defense Software | 2026-04-15 | 7.7 High |
| A vulnerability in the Remote Access SSL VPN service for Cisco Secure Firewall Adaptive Security Appliance (ASA) Software and Cisco Secure Firewall Threat Defense (FTD) Software could allow a remote attacker that is authenticated as a VPN user to cause the device to reload unexpectedly, resulting in a denial of service (DoS) condition. This vulnerability is due to incomplete error checking when parsing an HTTP header field value. An attacker could exploit this vulnerability by sending a crafted HTTP request to a targeted Remote Access SSL VPN service on an affected device. A successful exploit could allow the attacker to cause a DoS condition, which would cause the affected device to reload. | ||||
| CVE-2024-51210 | 1 Firepad | 1 Firepad | 2026-04-15 | 5.3 Medium |
| Firepad through 1.5.11 allows remote attackers, who have knowledge of a pad ID, to retrieve both the current text of a document and all content that has previously been pasted into the document. NOTE: in several similar products, this is the intentional behavior for anyone who knows the full document ID and corresponding URL. NOTE: This vulnerability only affects products that are no longer supported by the maintainer. | ||||
| CVE-2024-39323 | 1 Aimeos | 1 Ai-admin-graphql | 2026-04-15 | 7.1 High |
| aimeos/ai-admin-graphql is the Aimeos GraphQL API admin interface. Starting in version 2022.04.01 and prior to versions 2022.10.10, 2023.10.6, and 2024.04.6, an improper access control vulnerability allows an editor to modify and take over an admin account in the back end. Versions 2022.10.10, 2023.10.6, and 2024.04.6 fix this issue. | ||||
| CVE-2024-51562 | 1 Freebsd | 1 Freebsd | 2026-04-15 | 6.5 Medium |
| The NVMe driver function nvme_opc_get_log_page is vulnerable to a buffer over-read from a guest-controlled value. | ||||
| CVE-2023-43683 | 1 Malwarebytes | 1 Malwarebytes | 2026-04-15 | 6.5 Medium |
| An issue was discovered in Malwarebytes 4.6.14.326 and before 5.1.5.116 (and Nebula 2020-10-21 and later). A Stack buffer out-of-bounds access exists because of an integer underflow when handling newline characters. | ||||