| CVE |
Vendors |
Products |
Updated |
CVSS v3.1 |
| A flaw was found in Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform's automation-
controller. Notification template password fields are encrypted with a key
derived from the secret key, the object primary key, and the field name, but not
the subfield name, and the API returns the full ciphertext of a password subfield
after the notification type is changed to one that does not define that subfield.
A user with administrative access to a single notification template, but without
any wider privilege, can switch the template type to reveal the stored
ciphertext, replant that ciphertext into a webhook password field pointing at a
server they control, and trigger a test notification. The controller decrypts the
replayed ciphertext to the original plaintext and sends it to the attacker's
server in an HTTP Basic authorization header, allowing recovery of Slack,
PagerDuty, Twilio, AWS SNS, and Grafana credentials the administrator was only
permitted to use, not read. |
| A flaw was found in Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform's automation-controller. A user
with the delegated Instance Group Admin role on a container group can set a free-form
pod specification override that is deep-merged, without filtering, into every job pod
launched on that group. The only hardening applied is forcing
automountServiceAccountToken to false, which does not remove an explicitly declared
projected serviceAccountToken volume or secret volume mounts. A non-superuser can
therefore cause the kubelet to mint a ServiceAccount token for the control-plane
automation-controller service account into the job container and mount arbitrary
secrets from the control-plane namespace, obtaining the control-plane service-account
identity on the Kubernetes API and cleartext control-plane secrets (including the
platform database password and Django SECRET_KEY), leading to full platform data
compromise. |
| A flaw was found in Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform's automation-controller.
The host_filter query parameter on the hosts list API is parsed into a raw Django
ORM filter whose lookup path is validated only against a sensitive-field blocklist,
with no authorization check on the database relations it traverses. Because job
event and ad-hoc command output fields are not on that blocklist, an authenticated
user holding only the Read role on an inventory can construct filters that traverse
into the output of jobs they have no permission to view and use the returned host
count as a boolean oracle. Using regular-expression lookups, the attacker can
extract, character by character, the output (which routinely contains plaintext
credentials, tokens, and command results) of jobs and ad-hoc commands belonging to
other organizations, resulting in cross-tenant disclosure of job output |
| A flaw was found in Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform's automation-controller.
When creating or editing an execution environment, the controller does not verify
that the requesting user has use permission on the container registry credential
referenced by the execution environment; it validates only the organization and
the credential kind. An authenticated user who is an execution-environment admin
of one organization can associate a container registry credential belonging to a
different organization -- one they cannot otherwise read, list, or use -- to an
execution environment they control. When a job runs with that execution
environment, the controller decrypts the foreign credential's registry password
and supplies it to the container runtime, disclosing another organization's
registry credentials across the tenant boundary. |
| A flaw was found in Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform's automation-
controller. The Thycotic Secret Server external credential plugin passes a
user-supplied server URL to its SDK without validating the scheme, host, or IP
range, and the plugin backend is executed synchronously within the automation
controller web process. Using the external credential test endpoint, a user who
holds only the use role on such a credential can override the stored server URL
with an arbitrary internal address, causing the control plane to issue requests
to internal services. Although the response is a generic error, response timing
reveals whether internal hosts and ports are reachable, enabling internal
network reconnaissance and a blind request-forgery primitive from the control
plane, and each request can hold a web worker, affecting availability. |
| A flaw was found in Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform's automation-
controller. When attaching an instance group to a schedule or a workflow job
template node through the dedicated API relationship endpoint, the controller
verifies only that the requesting user can read (view) the instance group,
rather than that they hold use permission on it, unlike every other instance
group assignment in the product. An authenticated user with read-only
visibility of an instance group -- for example a system auditor -- can attach a
use-restricted instance group, including the control plane group or another
tenant's container group, to a schedule or workflow node they control. Their
playbook then executes on the control plane node or within another tenant's
execution environment, leading to privilege escalation and, in the control
plane case, full compromise of the platform. |
| A flaw was found in Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform's automation-
controller. A project has a signature validation credential foreign key used to
validate signed project content. Unlike the project's SCM credential, the
authorization logic does not verify that the requesting user has use permission
on the referenced credential, and the API field has no validator or type
restriction. An authenticated user holding only the organization project
administrator role can therefore bind an arbitrary credential belonging to
another organization, by its identifier, when creating or updating a project.
The controller discloses that credential's name and type in the project's
summary information and, during project synchronization, decrypts the bound
credential and uses it in the attacker-controlled project's update, allowing a
cross-tenant authorization boundary violation and information disclosure. |
| Axios is a promise based HTTP client for the browser and Node.js. From 0.19.0 to before 0.31.1 and 1.15.2, Axios contains prototype-pollution gadgets in request config processing. If another vulnerability in the same JavaScript process has already polluted Object.prototype.transformResponse, affected Axios versions may treat that inherited value as request configuration or as an option validator. Axios does not itself create the prototype pollution. Exploitability requires a separate prototype-pollution vulnerability or equivalent attacker control over Object.prototype before Axios creates a request. This vulnerability is fixed in 0.31.1 and 1.15.2. |
| A flaw was found in pulpcore's content serving application. Files uploaded to Pulp file-type repositories are served with their original content type (e.g., text/html for .html files, image/svg+xml for .svg files) and without a Content-Disposition: attachment header when using local filesystem storage. An authenticated user or attacker with content upload permissions can upload a specially crafted HTML or SVG file containing JavaScript, which executes in the browser of any user who visits the file URL, resulting in stored cross-site scripting (XSS) in the context of the host application. |
| JavaScript Cookie is a JavaScript API for handling cookies, client-side. Prior to version 3.0.7, js-cookie's internal assign() helper copies properties with for...in + plain assignment. When the source object is produced by JSON.parse, the JSON object's "__proto__" member is an own enumerable property, so the for…in enumerates it and the target[key] = source[key] write triggers the Object.prototype.__proto__ setter on the fresh target ({}). The result is a per-instance prototype hijack: Object.prototype itself is untouched, but the merged attributes object now inherits attacker-controlled keys. Because the consuming set() function then enumerates the merged object with another for...in, every key the attacker placed on the polluted prototype lands in the resulting Set-Cookie string as an attribute pair. The attacker can set domain=, secure=, samesite=, expires=, and path= on cookies whose attributes the developer thought were locked down. This issue has been patched in version 3.0.7. |
| A server-side request forgery (SSRF) vulnerability was found in galaxy_ng, the Ansible Galaxy server plugin for Pulp. An authenticated user with namespace management permissions can set a namespace avatar URL to an arbitrary address, including internal networks, loopback, or cloud instance metadata endpoints. A background worker fetches that URL without checking the destination, which lets the attacker probe internal services and enumerate reachable IP addresses. The HTTP client is also configured without an overall timeout, so a slow or non-responsive target can pin workers and cause a denial of service. |
| A path traversal vulnerability was found in AWX's project archive extraction. The project_archive action plugin extracts zip and tar archive members by joining the project directory path with the member filename without performing path normalization, boundary validation, or rejecting directory traversal sequences. A malicious archive containing members with path traversal components can write files to arbitrary locations on the execution node's filesystem outside the intended project directory. An attacker who controls the archive content, either through a compromised upstream source, a malicious archive URL, or a man-in-the-middle attack on a plain HTTP connection, can achieve arbitrary file writes as the user performing the extraction, potentially leading to remote code execution through mechanisms such as cron files, SSH authorized keys, or playbook content injection. |
| A server-side request forgery (SSRF) vulnerability was found in multiple AWX notification backends. The webhook, Mattermost, Rocket.Chat, and Grafana notification backends use notification template URLs as direct HTTP request targets without validating the target address against private, loopback, or reserved IP ranges. An organization notification administrator can create notification templates pointing to internal or loopback addresses, causing the AWX control node to issue HTTP requests to services that are not externally accessible. Additionally, the webhook notification backend follows HTTP redirects and resends configured Basic Authentication credentials to redirect targets regardless of host change, allowing an attacker to exfiltrate notification credentials by redirecting to an attacker-controlled host. The Grafana backend sends its API key in the Authorization header to the configured target URL. |
| A server-side request forgery (SSRF) vulnerability was found in AWX's webhook status callback mechanism. When processing GitHub pull request webhooks, AWX extracts the status callback URL (pull_request.statuses_url) from the incoming webhook payload without validating the target host against the expected Git provider. This URL is persisted in job extra variables and later used to send authenticated status updates. A user with admin role on a webhook-enabled job template can read the template's webhook signing key, forge a signed GitHub webhook payload with an arbitrary statuses_url, and cause AWX to POST status updates to an attacker-controlled or internal URL. The status update request includes the configured Git Personal Access Token (PAT) in the Authorization header, resulting in credential leakage to the attacker-specified endpoint. |
| A path traversal vulnerability was found in awxkit, the CLI tool for AWX. The YAML !include directive does not sanitize file paths, allowing an attacker to craft a malicious YAML file that reads arbitrary YAML-formatted files from the local filesystem when a user imports it using "awx --conf.format yaml import". This is a client-side vulnerability requiring user interaction. |
| A flaw was found in Ansible Lightspeed. This vulnerability, related to insufficient session expiration, allows a remote attacker to maintain persistent access to the Ansible Lightspeed instance. If an attacker exfiltrates a valid OAuth (Open Authorization) access token before a user logs out, they can continue to authenticate and access sensitive data. This is because the application fails to invalidate the token on the backend, leaving it valid until its natural expiration. This can lead to unauthorized read access to Ansible resources such as inventories, playbooks, and configuration data. |
| A flaw was found in the AAP Gateway Envoy proxy configuration. The non-mTLS route to EDA event streams does not remove the Subject HTTP header from client requests, despite the source code defining requestHeadersToRemove for this header. An unauthenticated remote attacker can inject a spoofed Subject header matching a legitimate client certificate DN to bypass mTLS authentication and inject arbitrary events into protected EDA event streams. |
| The HTTP/2 protocol allows a denial of service (server resource consumption) because request cancellation can reset many streams quickly, as exploited in the wild in August through October 2023. |
| A flaw was found in aap-gateway, a component of Ansible Automation Platform's Event-Driven Ansible (EDA). An unauthenticated remote attacker can bypass mutual Transport Layer Security (mTLS) authentication for event streams. This is achieved by manipulating the event stream URL and forging the HTTP Subject header. The system also inadvertently discloses the expected certificate subject in error messages, which simplifies the attack. This vulnerability allows an attacker to inject arbitrary events into EDA, potentially triggering automated workflows. |
| A flaw was found in the Event-Driven Ansible (EDA) server. The ExternalEventStreamViewSet uses permissive access controls (permission_classes=[AllowAny], authentication_classes=[]) and relies solely on the Subject HTTP header value for mTLS authentication without verifying that the header originated from a trusted proxy. Additionally, the expected certificate Distinguished Name is leaked in the 403 error response body. An attacker who can reach the EDA API endpoint with a spoofed Subject header can inject arbitrary events into mTLS-protected event streams, triggering downstream automation actions. |
