| CVE |
Vendors |
Products |
Updated |
CVSS v3.1 |
| An unauthenticated remote attacker can perform a CSRF attack on a logged in backend user allowing for execution of multiple critical system actions. This could allow an attacker to shutdown the server or restore an uploaded backup. This can result in a loss of integrity and availability. |
| SAP HANA XSA Web Dispatcher does not perform sufficient request validation in certain administrative functionality. In the context of SAP HANA XSA Web Dispatcher, an unauthenticated attacker could trick a logged-on administrator into visiting a malicious link. Visiting the link could cause unintended actions in the administrator's session. Successful exploitation could lead to a temporary compromise of the SAP HANA XSA Web Dispatcher, resulting in a high impact on confidentiality, and partial impact on integrity, and availability. |
| SAP NetWeaver Enterprise Portal does not sufficiently protect certain server-side actions against cross-site request forgery. An unauthenticated attacker could craft a malicious link that, when clicked by an authenticated user, triggers an unintended action on the server. Successful exploitation could allow the attacker to modify non-sensitive information, resulting in a low impact on integrity. There is no impact on confidentiality and availability. |
| SAP Web Dispatcher and SAP NetWeaver Application Server ABAP (Internet Communication Manager) do not perform sufficient request validation in certain administrative functionality. In the context of Application Server ABAP and SAP Web Dispatcher, an unauthenticated attacker could trick a logged-on administrator into visiting a malicious link. Visiting the link could cause unintended actions in the administrator's session. Successful exploitation could lead to a full compromise of the underlying operating system, resulting in a high impact on confidentiality, integrity, and availability. |
| A vulnerability was determined in SourceCodester Smart Attendance System with QR Code Scanner 1.0. Affected by this vulnerability is an unknown functionality. Executing a manipulation can lead to cross-site request forgery. It is possible to launch the attack remotely. The exploit has been publicly disclosed and may be utilized. |
| Vulnerability in the Siebel Life Sciences product of Oracle Siebel CRM (component: Web UI). Supported versions that are affected are 17.0-26.9. Easily exploitable vulnerability allows low privileged attacker with network access via HTTP to compromise Siebel Life Sciences. Successful attacks require human interaction from a person other than the attacker and while the vulnerability is in Siebel Life Sciences, attacks may significantly impact additional products (scope change). Successful attacks of this vulnerability can result in unauthorized creation, deletion or modification access to critical data or all Siebel Life Sciences accessible data as well as unauthorized access to critical data or complete access to all Siebel Life Sciences accessible data. CVSS 3.1 Base Score 8.7 (Confidentiality and Integrity impacts). CVSS Vector: (CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:R/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:N). |
| CGI versions before 5.00 for Perl allow the POSTDATA, PUTDATA, PATCHDATA and XForms:Model parameters to be set from the query string or form fields.
CGI stores a non-form request body under POSTDATA, PUTDATA or PATCHDATA, and an XForms body under XForms:Model, but also accepts these names from the query string, a form field or a multipart part, so an application cannot tell a client-sent value from the real body.
A cross-site HTML form can post POSTDATA={"admin":true} to an endpoint that reads JSON from param('POSTDATA'), a request forgery that needs no CORS preflight. |
| Tasmota through 16.0.0, fixed in commit 1cb7ebc, contains a cross-site request forgery vulnerability that allows unauthenticated attackers to bypass Referer-based CSRF protection in HttpCheckPriviledgedAccess() by crafting a Referer header where the device hostname or IP appears as a substring immediately after http://.evil.com/. Attackers can lure an administrator on the device's network to a malicious page to issue arbitrary console commands and reconfigure Wi-Fi, MQTT, settings, or firmware on devices lacking a WebPassword. |
| AB Download Manager before 1.11.2 contains a cross-site request forgery vulnerability in its unauthenticated browser-integration API that allows remote attackers to write attacker-chosen files to arbitrary paths. A malicious web page can send a text/plain request to /start-headless-download with crafted folder and name values, placing payloads in startup folders for code execution on next login. |
| Vikunja before 2.7.1 contains a cross-site request forgery vulnerability that allows attackers to import their data into a victim's account because the Todoist, Microsoft To Do, and Trello migration OAuth callbacks lack a bound state parameter. Attackers can authorize their own account, keep the unused callback code or token, and lure a logged-in victim to the migration callback route to auto-import attacker-chosen projects and tasks containing phishing links. |
| Vulnerability in Oracle Trusted Answer Search (component: Application expert UI). The supported version that is affected is 26.1. Easily exploitable vulnerability allows low privileged attacker with network access via HTTP to compromise Oracle Trusted Answer Search. Successful attacks require human interaction from a person other than the attacker and while the vulnerability is in Oracle Trusted Answer Search, attacks may significantly impact additional products (scope change). Successful attacks of this vulnerability can result in unauthorized access to critical data or complete access to all Oracle Trusted Answer Search accessible data as well as unauthorized update, insert or delete access to some of Oracle Trusted Answer Search accessible data. CVSS 3.1 Base Score 7.6 (Confidentiality and Integrity impacts). CVSS Vector: (CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:R/S:C/C:H/I:L/A:N). |
| IBM Security Verify Directory 10.0.0 through 10.0.4 and IBM Verify Directory 11.0.0 does not set the SameSite attribute on session cookies, making it vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) attacks. An attacker can cause authenticated users' browsers to send unauthorized requests to the application. |
| IBM Guardium Data Protection 12.2.4 could allow a remote attacker to bypass security restrictions due to improper validation of CSRF tokens for GET requests. |
| IBM Cognos Command Center 10.2.4.1 and 10.2.5 could allow a remote attacker to execute unauthorized processes due to cross-site request forgery. |
| OpenAM from 14.5.1 before 16.1.4 contains a cross-site request forgery vulnerability in the OAuth 2.0 device authorization flow that allows attackers to approve device codes when consent is skipped for implied-consent clients. Attackers can start a device authorization and lure a logged-in user to a crafted page, obtaining access and ID tokens to call APIs as that user. |
| Vikunja 2.0.0 before 2.7.1 accepts form-encoded bodies on the /api/v2 login and OIDC callback endpoints without CSRF or Origin checks, enabling login cross-site request forgery. An attacker with an account can lure a victim to a page posting the attacker's credentials or OIDC code, switching the victim into the attacker's account and exposing data the victim then adds. |
| The WP Google Review Slider WordPress plugin before 18.11 does not perform nonce validation when updating its active Google Places configuration, allowing attackers to alter or destroy that configuration via a forged request, provided they can trick a site administrator into following a crafted link. |
| The Komfortkasse for WooCommerce WordPress plugin before 1.4.9 does not properly validate the authenticity of REST API requests, overriding WordPress's own nonce verification so that a request forged in a logged-in administrator's browser is accepted, which can be used to create a new administrator account and fully take over the site. |
| Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Suplugins Superb Addons: Blocks, Patterns & Theme Designer superb-blocks allows Cross Site Request Forgery.This issue affects Superb Addons: Blocks, Patterns & Theme Designer: from n/a through 4.2.4. |
| Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Wpmet Wp Social wp-social allows Cross Site Request Forgery.This issue affects Wp Social: from n/a through 3.2.3. |
