Export limit exceeded: 30079 CVEs match your query. Please refine your search to export 10,000 CVEs or fewer.
Search
Search Results (30079 CVEs found)
| CVE | Vendors | Products | Updated | CVSS v3.1 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CVE-2024-5535 | 5 Debian, Netapp, Openssl and 2 more | 72 Debian Linux, 500f, 500f Firmware and 69 more | 2026-11-10 | 9.1 Critical |
| Issue summary: Calling the OpenSSL API function SSL_select_next_proto with an empty supported client protocols buffer may cause a crash or memory contents to be sent to the peer. Impact summary: A buffer overread can have a range of potential consequences such as unexpected application beahviour or a crash. In particular this issue could result in up to 255 bytes of arbitrary private data from memory being sent to the peer leading to a loss of confidentiality. However, only applications that directly call the SSL_select_next_proto function with a 0 length list of supported client protocols are affected by this issue. This would normally never be a valid scenario and is typically not under attacker control but may occur by accident in the case of a configuration or programming error in the calling application. The OpenSSL API function SSL_select_next_proto is typically used by TLS applications that support ALPN (Application Layer Protocol Negotiation) or NPN (Next Protocol Negotiation). NPN is older, was never standardised and is deprecated in favour of ALPN. We believe that ALPN is significantly more widely deployed than NPN. The SSL_select_next_proto function accepts a list of protocols from the server and a list of protocols from the client and returns the first protocol that appears in the server list that also appears in the client list. In the case of no overlap between the two lists it returns the first item in the client list. In either case it will signal whether an overlap between the two lists was found. In the case where SSL_select_next_proto is called with a zero length client list it fails to notice this condition and returns the memory immediately following the client list pointer (and reports that there was no overlap in the lists). This function is typically called from a server side application callback for ALPN or a client side application callback for NPN. In the case of ALPN the list of protocols supplied by the client is guaranteed by libssl to never be zero in length. The list of server protocols comes from the application and should never normally be expected to be of zero length. In this case if the SSL_select_next_proto function has been called as expected (with the list supplied by the client passed in the client/client_len parameters), then the application will not be vulnerable to this issue. If the application has accidentally been configured with a zero length server list, and has accidentally passed that zero length server list in the client/client_len parameters, and has additionally failed to correctly handle a "no overlap" response (which would normally result in a handshake failure in ALPN) then it will be vulnerable to this problem. In the case of NPN, the protocol permits the client to opportunistically select a protocol when there is no overlap. OpenSSL returns the first client protocol in the no overlap case in support of this. The list of client protocols comes from the application and should never normally be expected to be of zero length. However if the SSL_select_next_proto function is accidentally called with a client_len of 0 then an invalid memory pointer will be returned instead. If the application uses this output as the opportunistic protocol then the loss of confidentiality will occur. This issue has been assessed as Low severity because applications are most likely to be vulnerable if they are using NPN instead of ALPN - but NPN is not widely used. It also requires an application configuration or programming error. Finally, this issue would not typically be under attacker control making active exploitation unlikely. The FIPS modules in 3.3, 3.2, 3.1 and 3.0 are not affected by this issue. Due to the low severity of this issue we are not issuing new releases of OpenSSL at this time. The fix will be included in the next releases when they become available. | ||||
| CVE-2026-121115 | 1 Google | 1 Chrome | 2026-11-10 | 6.5 Medium |
| Improper input validation in Shopping in Google Chrome prior to 157.0.8103.38 allowed a remote attacker to bypass system access restrictions into a privileged page via crafted network traffic. (Chromium security severity: Medium) | ||||
| CVE-2026-106713 | 2026-11-10 | 7.5 High | ||
| An issue in FreeReels for Android version 2.3.11 allows a remote attacker to obtain sensitive information via the com.dramawave.feature.web.WebPageActivity component | ||||
| CVE-2026-77696 | 1 Openssl | 1 Openssl | 2026-11-10 | 3.7 Low |
| Issue summary: SM2 signature generation uses non-constant-time arithmetic on secret values, forming a timing side-channel. Impact summary: An attacker able to measure SM2 signing times may learn information about the per-signature secret nonce, which over many signatures can, via a lattice / Hidden Number Problem attack, lead to recovery of the private key. CWE: CWE-208: Observable Timing Discrepancy Description: SM2 signature generation computes the signature value using variable-time BIGNUM operations on the secret nonce and the private key, so the time taken to produce an SM2 signature depends on these secret values, forming a timing side-channel. Applications performing SM2 signature generation are affected on all platforms. FIPS Impact: no SM2 is not a FIPS algorithm. | ||||
| CVE-2026-54872 | 1 Openssl | 1 Openssl | 2026-11-10 | 3.7 Low |
| Issue summary: The generic elliptic-curve scalar multiplication used for ECDSA and SM2 signature operations with curves that do not have a dedicated implementation leaks information about the secret nonce through timing. Impact summary: An attacker able to measure signing times may learn information about the per-signature secret nonce, which over many signatures can, via a lattice / Hidden Number Problem attack, lead to recovery of the private key. CWE: CWE-208: Observable Timing Discrepancy Description: The generic elliptic-curve scalar multiplication used for curves that do not have a dedicated constant-time implementation pads the secret scalar with non-constant-time BIGNUM operations, so the time taken depends on the value of the secret scalar derived from the ECDSA and SM2 nonce. The leak is very small; observing it requires a large number of measurements. The effect is largest for curves whose group order lies on a machine-word boundary, such as brainpoolP384r1. Applications using ECDSA signing over the Brainpool and other generic prime curves, and SM2 signing on platforms that use the generic implementation, are vulnerable to this issue. The NIST curves P-256, P-384 and P-521 use dedicated constant-time implementations and are not affected. FIPS Impact: no The FIPS modules are not affected: the approved NIST curves used in the FIPS provider have dedicated constant-time implementations and do not use the affected code path. | ||||
| CVE-2026-111821 | 1 Apache | 2 Activemq, Activemq Kahadb | 2026-11-10 | 7.5 High |
| Improper input validation vulnerability in Apache ActiveMQ, Apache ActiveMQ KahaDB. A user can create a durable subscription with a clientId and subscription name that have a combined length > 65,535 (while separately being shorter) on a broker using KahaDB which can cause the broker to shutdown and be unrecoverable. This issue affects Apache ActiveMQ: from 6.0.0 before 6.3.3, before 5.19.12; Apache ActiveMQ KahaDB: from 6.0.0 before 6.3.3, before 5.19.12. Users are recommended to upgrade to version 6.4.0, 6.3.3 or 5.19.12, which fixes the issue. | ||||
| CVE-2026-108946 | 1 Apache | 2 Activemq, Activemq Broker | 2026-11-10 | 6.5 Medium |
| Improper input validation vulnerability in Apache ActiveMQ, Apache ActiveMQ KahaDB. The ActiveMQ broker resolves connection, session and consumer state from ids that are user provided and in some scenarios does not validate that they ids are bound to that user. This allows an authenticated client to spoof another user's ids. This allows: * an authenticated client consumes from another connection's temporary queue/topic by putting the victim's connection id in its own ConsumerId, bypassing the broker-side ownership check. * a duplicate ConsumerId registration is only logged, after which the attacker's RemoveInfo or disconnect tears down the victim's live subscription * a forged MessageAck for the victim's ConsumerId permanently deletes an in-flight, unacknowledged message. This issue affects Apache ActiveMQ: from 6.0.0 before 6.3.3, before 5.19.12; Apache ActiveMQ KahaDB: from 6.0.0 before 6.3.3, before 5.19.12. Users are recommended to upgrade to version 6.4.0, 6.3.3, or 5.19.12, which fixes the issue. | ||||
| CVE-2026-106716 | 2026-11-10 | 6.5 Medium | ||
| ReelShort for Android version 3.8.55 loads an attacker-controlled activityUrl supplied through its cmsvictor://open deep link in a WebView that exposes the Android and Offerwall JavaScript bridges without validating the page origin. After a user opens the crafted link, the page can invoke getUserInfo, getCredentials, and initUser to obtain user metadata and an encrypted credential payload. | ||||
| CVE-2026-125871 | 1 Misp | 2 Misp-modules, Misp Modules | 2026-11-10 | N/A |
| The sourcecache expansion module in MISP Modules (misp-modules) contains a Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability. When a user with permission to create or modify attributes of type 'link' or 'url' submits an attribute value, the module passes the URL directly to its internal archiving function without any validation of the target address. An attacker can therefore craft a URL pointing to loopback addresses (e.g., 127.0.0.1), private network ranges, link-local addresses, or cloud metadata endpoints (e.g., 169.254.169.254). The MISP server will issue an HTTP request to that target and store the response body in the event, effectively exfiltrating data from internal services to the attacker through the MISP interface. Non-HTTP schemes such as file:// are also accepted, potentially allowing local file disclosure. The vulnerability requires an authenticated MISP user with the ability to create or edit attributes of the affected types. The security impact is information disclosure from internal services reachable by the MISP server, including sensitive data such as cloud credentials, internal application data, or local files. | ||||
| CVE-2026-125703 | 1 Redhat | 2 Enterprise Linux, Rhel Els | 2026-11-10 | 5.5 Medium |
| A flaw was found in the GStreamer gst-plugins-bad MXF plugin. Insufficient bounds checks when parsing crafted VANC data can cause an out-of-bounds read in the demuxer, while an incorrect buffer size calculation when muxing multiple ancillary packets can cause an out-of-bounds write. Processing affected content may crash the application, resulting in a denial of service. | ||||
| CVE-2026-11883 | 1 Wordpress-extensions | 1 Webauthn Provider For Two Factor | 2026-11-10 | 7.2 High |
| The WebAuthn Provider for Two Factor WordPress plugin before 2.5.6 does not correctly validate the second-factor authentication response, allowing an attacker who already knows a user's password to bypass the two-factor authentication requirement by submitting a malformed request. | ||||
| CVE-2026-11781 | 1 Wordpress-extensions | 1 Adminify | 2026-11-10 | 2.7 Low |
| The Adminify WordPress plugin before 4.2.10 does not perform per-user read-capability checks on the results returned by one of its administration search features, allowing users with a low-privilege role (Contributor) to disclose non-public content that WordPress would not otherwise expose to them, such as other authors' unpublished post titles, pending comment content, the site's Adminify WordPress plugin before 4.2.10 inventory, and user account names. | ||||
| CVE-2024-6228 | 1 Wordpress-extensions | 1 Wanotifier | 2026-11-10 | 7.5 High |
| The Notifications for Forms & WordPress Actions WordPress plugin before 2.6 does not validate a user-supplied value before using it to build a server-side file inclusion path, allowing authenticated users with subscriber-level access and above to include and execute arbitrary local PHP files on the server. | ||||
| CVE-2026-11571 | 1 Wordpress-extensions | 1 Everest Forms | 2026-11-10 | 7.5 High |
| The Everest Forms WordPress plugin before 3.5.0 does not reliably delete temporary CSV files generated during email-notification processing and leaves them publicly accessible in the uploads directory, allowing unauthenticated attackers to retrieve other users' form submission records via predictable, enumerable filenames. | ||||
| CVE-2026-12517 | 1 Wordpress-extensions | 1 Fediverse Embeds | 2026-11-10 | 5.3 Medium |
| The Fediverse Embeds WordPress plugin before 1.5.8 does not validate the destination of the server-side request performed by an unauthenticated site-info endpoint before fetching it, allowing anonymous users (the gating nonce is exposed on public pages carrying an embed) to make the site request internal and private-network URLs and read back the parsed page metadata. This is a Server-Side Request Forgery. | ||||
| CVE-2026-15288 | 2 Brainstormforce, Wordpress-extensions | 2 Sureforms, Sureforms | 2026-11-10 | 7.5 High |
| The SureForms – Drag and Drop Form Builder for WordPress plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Improper Input Validation in all versions up to, and including, 2.2.1. This is due to the plugin accepting the payment amount directly from user-controlled POST data in the 'create_payment_intent' and 'create_subscription_intent' functions without validating it against the form's configured price. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to modify the payment amount to any arbitrary value when submitting a Stripe payment form, potentially purchasing products or services at significantly reduced prices. | ||||
| CVE-2026-12685 | 1 Wordpress-extensions | 1 Escortwp | 2026-11-10 | 7.5 High |
| The EscortWP escortwp WordPress theme through 3.6.2 was distributed with a vendor-authored, obfuscated backdoor that lets an unauthenticated attacker who supplies a hard-coded, per-build key permanently delete all of the site's content, and that covertly transmits the site URL, administrator email address, and license key to a third-party server. | ||||
| CVE-2026-12275 | 1 Wordpress-extensions | 1 Tutor Lms | 2026-11-10 | 7.1 High |
| The Tutor LMS WordPress plugin before 3.9.13 does not, in its Droip and Kirki page-builder integration, perform the enrollment, purchase, and private-course capability checks it enforces in its core course handler, allowing authenticated users with subscriber-level access to enroll in paid or private courses without authorization, read private course content, and mark arbitrary courses as completed, on sites where the Droip or Kirki integration is active. | ||||
| CVE-2026-12397 | 1 Wordpress-extensions | 1 Wp Job Portal | 2026-11-10 | 4.3 Medium |
| The WP Job Portal WordPress plugin before 2.5.5 does not verify ownership when returning an employer's contact email for a given job, allowing authenticated users with a subscriber-level (self-registerable) account to read other employers' private account email addresses by enumerating job identifiers. | ||||
| CVE-2026-13402 | 1 Wordpress-extensions | 1 Royal Elementor Addons | 2026-11-10 | 5.3 Medium |
| The Royal Addons for Elementor WordPress plugin before 1.7.1063 does not check the post status of menu items or the templates they reference in one of its REST endpoints, allowing unauthenticated users to retrieve the rendered HTML content of private or draft Elementor templates linked from non-public navigation menu items. | ||||