Export limit exceeded: 10714 CVEs match your query. Please refine your search to export 10,000 CVEs or fewer.
Search
Search Results (10714 CVEs found)
| CVE | Vendors | Products | Updated | CVSS v3.1 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CVE-2026-97867 | 2026-11-10 | N/A | ||
| The EJBd remote protocol returns datasource connection details, including database credentials, to remote clients that look up a datasource. A remote client able to reach the EJBd endpoint can obtain the database credentials and connect to the database directly. Users are recommended to upgrade to version 10.3.0 or 11.0.0-M2, which fix the issue. | ||||
| CVE-2026-123082 | 1 Docker | 1 Desktop | 2026-11-10 | N/A |
| Docker Desktop before version 4.94.0 could write the signed-in user's Docker Hub access token (a JWT) in cleartext to application logs and diagnostics bundles. IPC payloads that were bare JSON strings or arrays were not redacted before logging, and a Docker Desktop component logged the token when it requested it from the backend. An attacker with read access to these files could obtain the token and use it to read and modify the user's Docker Hub data as that user while the token remains valid. Docker Desktop 4.94.0 redacts these payloads. The fix does not rewrite logs written by earlier versions, which can still contain tokens after upgrading. | ||||
| CVE-2026-7017 | 1 Haarg | 1 Http::tiny | 2026-11-10 | 7.1 High |
| HTTP::Tiny versions before 0.095 for Perl forward credential headers to cross-origin redirect targets. When the server returns a 3xx redirect, `_maybe_redirect` follows the `Location:` header and `_prepare_headers_and_cb` re-merges the caller's `headers` argument into the new request, without checking whether the redirect target shares an origin with the original URL. Caller-supplied `Authorization`, `Cookie` and `Proxy-Authorization` headers are therefore re-sent to whatever host the redirect names, across scheme, host or port boundaries, and including `https` to `http` downgrades that expose them in plaintext on the wire. The HTTP::Tiny POD note that "Authorization headers will not be included in a redirected request" applied only to the URL-userinfo Basic-auth path, not to headers passed explicitly by the caller. | ||||
| CVE-2026-42497 | 2 Archive\, Bingos | 2 \, Archive::tar | 2026-11-10 | 7.5 High |
| Archive::Tar versions before 3.08 for Perl extract hardlinks to attacker controlled paths outside the extraction directory. _make_special_file() passes the tar header's linkname to link() without validating it against absolute paths or .. segments, creating a hardlink that shares the victim file's inode. A subsequent write through the extracted name modifies the victim file, and the post-extraction chmod, chown, and utime block in _extract_file() (guarded only against symlinks via -l) applies the tar header's mode, owner, and timestamps to the shared inode during extraction alone. | ||||
| CVE-2026-42496 | 2 Archive\, Bingos | 2 \, Archive::tar | 2026-11-10 | 9.1 Critical |
| Archive::Tar versions before 3.08 for Perl extract symlinks with attacker controlled targets outside the extraction directory. _make_special_file() passes the tar header's linkname to symlink() without validating it against absolute paths or .. segments. The secure-extract mode check that guards regular file extraction does not cover the symlink target. A subsequent open through the extracted name reads or writes the attacker chosen path. | ||||
| CVE-2026-15806 | 1 Python | 1 Cpython | 2026-11-10 | N/A |
| The HTTPPasswordMgr class in the urllib.request module, along with its subclasses HTTPPasswordMgrWithDefaultRealm and HTTPPasswordMgrWithPriorAuth, did not take the URL scheme into account when matching stored credentials against a requested URL. Credentials added for an https:// URL were also used for requests to the same host over http://, so an attacker able to redirect or downgrade a client to plain HTTP (for example, via an HTTPS-to-HTTP redirect or an on-path position) could capture credentials in cleartext. Credentials added for http:// URLs could likewise be sent over https://. Credential matching is now scoped by URL scheme. Credentials registered with a URL that includes a scheme are only used for requests with the same scheme. Credentials registered with a bare authority (such as example.com or example.com:8080) continue to match any scheme, preserving compatibility with existing code, including proxy authentication. Users who cannot upgrade immediately can mitigate by ensuring that applications never make plain http:// requests to hosts for which credentials are registered, for example by not following redirects to http:// URLs. | ||||
| CVE-2025-40759 | 2026-11-10 | 7.8 High | ||
| A vulnerability has been identified in SIMATIC S7-PLCSIM V17 (All versions), SIMATIC STEP 7 V17 (All versions < V17 Update 9), SIMATIC STEP 7 V18 (All versions < V18 Update 6), SIMATIC STEP 7 V19 (All versions < V19 Update 4), SIMATIC STEP 7 V20 (All versions < V20 Update 4), SIMATIC WinCC V17 (All versions < V17 Update 9), SIMATIC WinCC V18 (All versions < V18 Update 6), SIMATIC WinCC V19 (All versions < V19 Update 4), SIMATIC WinCC V20 (All versions < V20 Update 4), SIMOCODE ES V17 (All versions), SIMOCODE ES V18 (All versions), SIMOCODE ES V19 (All versions), SIMOCODE ES V20 (All versions), SIMOTION SCOUT TIA V5.4 (All versions), SIMOTION SCOUT TIA V5.5 (All versions), SIMOTION SCOUT TIA V5.6 (All versions < V5.6 SP1 HF7), SIMOTION SCOUT TIA V5.7 (All versions), SINAMICS Startdrive V17 (All versions), SINAMICS Startdrive V18 (All versions), SINAMICS Startdrive V19 (All versions), SINAMICS Startdrive V20 (All versions), SIRIUS Safety ES V17 (TIA Portal) (All versions), SIRIUS Safety ES V18 (TIA Portal) (All versions), SIRIUS Safety ES V19 (TIA Portal) (All versions), SIRIUS Safety ES V20 (TIA Portal) (All versions), SIRIUS Soft Starter ES V17 (TIA Portal) (All versions), SIRIUS Soft Starter ES V18 (TIA Portal) (All versions), SIRIUS Soft Starter ES V19 (TIA Portal) (All versions), SIRIUS Soft Starter ES V20 (TIA Portal) (All versions), TIA Portal Cloud V17 (All versions < V6.0.0.0), TIA Portal Cloud V18 (All versions < V6.3.0.2), TIA Portal Cloud V19 (All versions < V5.2.1.1), TIA Portal Cloud V20 (All versions < V5.2.2.2). Affected products do not properly sanitize stored security properties when parsing project files. This could allow an attacker to cause a type confusion and execute arbitrary code within the affected application. | ||||
| CVE-2025-40742 | 2026-11-10 | 5.3 Medium | ||
| A vulnerability has been identified in SIPROTEC 5 6MD84 (CP300) (All versions < V11.0), SIPROTEC 5 6MD85 (CP300) (All versions < V11.0), SIPROTEC 5 6MD86 (CP300) (All versions < V11.0), SIPROTEC 5 6MD89 (CP300) (All versions < V11.0), SIPROTEC 5 6MD89 (CP300) V9.6x (All versions < V11.0), SIPROTEC 5 6MU85 (CP300) (All versions < V11.0), SIPROTEC 5 7KE85 (CP300) (All versions < V11.0), SIPROTEC 5 7SA82 (CP100) (All versions < V8.91), SIPROTEC 5 7SA82 (CP150) (All versions < V11.0), SIPROTEC 5 7SA86 (CP300) (All versions < V11.0), SIPROTEC 5 7SA87 (CP300) (All versions < V11.0), SIPROTEC 5 7SD82 (CP100) (All versions < V8.91), SIPROTEC 5 7SD82 (CP150) (All versions < V11.0), SIPROTEC 5 7SD86 (CP300) (All versions < V11.0), SIPROTEC 5 7SD87 (CP300) (All versions < V11.0), SIPROTEC 5 7SJ81 (CP100) (All versions < V8.91), SIPROTEC 5 7SJ81 (CP150) (All versions < V11.0), SIPROTEC 5 7SJ82 (CP100) (All versions < V8.91), SIPROTEC 5 7SJ82 (CP150) (All versions < V11.0), SIPROTEC 5 7SJ85 (CP300) (All versions < V11.0), SIPROTEC 5 7SJ86 (CP300) (All versions < V11.0), SIPROTEC 5 7SK82 (CP100) (All versions < V8.91), SIPROTEC 5 7SK82 (CP150) (All versions < V11.0), SIPROTEC 5 7SK85 (CP300) (All versions < V11.0), SIPROTEC 5 7SL82 (CP100) (All versions < V8.91), SIPROTEC 5 7SL82 (CP150) (All versions < V11.0), SIPROTEC 5 7SL86 (CP300) (All versions < V11.0), SIPROTEC 5 7SL87 (CP300) (All versions < V11.0), SIPROTEC 5 7SS85 (CP300) (All versions < V11.0), SIPROTEC 5 7ST85 (CP300) (All versions < V11.0), SIPROTEC 5 7ST86 (CP300) (All versions < V11.0), SIPROTEC 5 7SX82 (CP150) (All versions < V11.0), SIPROTEC 5 7SX85 (CP300) (All versions < V11.0), SIPROTEC 5 7SY82 (CP150) (All versions < V11.0), SIPROTEC 5 7UM85 (CP300) (All versions < V11.0), SIPROTEC 5 7UT82 (CP100) (All versions < V8.91), SIPROTEC 5 7UT82 (CP150) (All versions < V11.0), SIPROTEC 5 7UT85 (CP300) (All versions < V11.0), SIPROTEC 5 7UT86 (CP300) (All versions < V11.0), SIPROTEC 5 7UT87 (CP300) (All versions < V11.0), SIPROTEC 5 7VE85 (CP300) (All versions < V11.0), SIPROTEC 5 7VK87 (CP300) (All versions < V11.0), SIPROTEC 5 7VU85 (CP300) (All versions < V11.0), SIPROTEC 5 Compact 7SX800 (CP050) (All versions < V11.0). The affected devices include session identifiers in URL requests for certain functionalities. This could allow an attacker to retrieve sensitive session data from browser history, logs, or other storage mechanisms, potentially leading to unauthorized access. | ||||
| CVE-2024-54678 | 1 Siemens | 13 Simatic Pcs Neo, Simatic S7-plcsim, Simatic Step 7 and 10 more | 2026-11-10 | 8.2 High |
| A vulnerability has been identified in SIMATIC PCS neo V4.1 (All versions), SIMATIC PCS neo V5.0 (All versions), SIMATIC PCS neo V6.0 (All versions < V6.0 SP1 Update 1), SIMATIC S7-PLCSIM V17 (All versions), SIMATIC STEP 7 V17 (All versions < V17 Update 9), SIMATIC STEP 7 V18 (All versions < V18 Update 6), SIMATIC STEP 7 V19 (All versions < V19 Update 4), SIMATIC STEP 7 V20 (All versions < V20 Update 4), SIMATIC WinCC V17 (All versions < V17 Update 9), SIMATIC WinCC V18 (All versions < V18 Update 6), SIMATIC WinCC V19 (All versions < V19 Update 4), SIMATIC WinCC V20 (All versions < V20 Update 4), SIMOCODE ES V17 (All versions), SIMOCODE ES V18 (All versions), SIMOCODE ES V19 (All versions), SIMOCODE ES V20 (All versions), SIMOTION SCOUT TIA V5.4 (All versions < V17 Update 9), SIMOTION SCOUT TIA V5.5 (All versions < V18 Update 6), SIMOTION SCOUT TIA V5.6 (All versions < V19 Update 4), SIMOTION SCOUT TIA V5.7 (All versions < V20 Update 4), SINAMICS Startdrive V17 (All versions), SINAMICS Startdrive V18 (All versions), SINAMICS Startdrive V19 (All versions), SINAMICS Startdrive V20 (All versions), SIRIUS Safety ES V17 (TIA Portal) (All versions), SIRIUS Safety ES V18 (TIA Portal) (All versions), SIRIUS Safety ES V19 (TIA Portal) (All versions), SIRIUS Safety ES V20 (TIA Portal) (All versions), SIRIUS Soft Starter ES V17 (TIA Portal) (All versions), SIRIUS Soft Starter ES V18 (TIA Portal) (All versions), SIRIUS Soft Starter ES V19 (TIA Portal) (All versions), SIRIUS Soft Starter ES V20 (TIA Portal) (All versions), TIA Portal Cloud V17 (All versions < V6.0.0.0), TIA Portal Cloud V18 (All versions < V6.3.0.2), TIA Portal Cloud V19 (All versions < V5.2.1.1), TIA Portal Cloud V20 (All versions < V5.2.2.2), TIA Portal Test Suite V20 (All versions < V20 Update 4). Affected products do not properly sanitize Interprocess Communication input received through a Windows Named Pipe accessible to all local users. This could allow an authenticated local attacker to cause a type confusion and execute arbitrary code within the affected application. | ||||
| CVE-2024-49849 | 2026-11-10 | 7.8 High | ||
| A vulnerability has been identified in SIMATIC S7-PLCSIM V16 (All versions), SIMATIC S7-PLCSIM V17 (All versions), SIMATIC STEP 7 Safety V16 (All versions), SIMATIC STEP 7 Safety V17 (All versions < V17 Update 9), SIMATIC STEP 7 Safety V18 (All versions < V18 Update 6), SIMATIC STEP 7 Safety V19 (All versions < V19 Update 4), SIMATIC STEP 7 V16 (All versions), SIMATIC STEP 7 V17 (All versions < V17 Update 9), SIMATIC STEP 7 V18 (All versions < V18 Update 6), SIMATIC STEP 7 V19 (All versions < V19 Update 4), SIMATIC WinCC Unified V16 (All versions), SIMATIC WinCC Unified V17 (All versions < V17 Update 9), SIMATIC WinCC Unified V18 (All versions < V18 Update 6), SIMATIC WinCC Unified V19 (All versions < V19 Update 4), SIMATIC WinCC V16 (All versions), SIMATIC WinCC V17 (All versions < V17 Update 9), SIMATIC WinCC V18 (All versions < V18 Update 6), SIMATIC WinCC V19 (All versions < V19 Update 4), SIMOCODE ES V16 (All versions), SIMOCODE ES V17 (All versions), SIMOCODE ES V18 (All versions), SIMOCODE ES V19 (All versions), SIMOTION SCOUT TIA V5.4 (All versions < V17 Update 9), SIMOTION SCOUT TIA V5.5 (All versions < V18 Update 6), SIMOTION SCOUT TIA V5.6 (All versions < V19 Update 4), SINAMICS Startdrive V16 (All versions), SINAMICS Startdrive V17 (All versions), SINAMICS Startdrive V18 (All versions), SINAMICS Startdrive V19 (All versions), SIRIUS Safety ES V17 (TIA Portal) (All versions), SIRIUS Safety ES V18 (TIA Portal) (All versions < V18 Update 6), SIRIUS Safety ES V19 (TIA Portal) (All versions), SIRIUS Soft Starter ES V17 (TIA Portal) (All versions), SIRIUS Soft Starter ES V18 (TIA Portal) (All versions), SIRIUS Soft Starter ES V19 (TIA Portal) (All versions), TIA Portal Cloud V16 (All versions), TIA Portal Cloud V17 (All versions < V6.0.0.0), TIA Portal Cloud V18 (All versions < V6.3.0.2), TIA Portal Cloud V19 (All versions < V5.2.1.1). Affected products do not properly sanitize user-controllable input when parsing log files. This could allow an attacker to cause a type confusion and execute arbitrary code within the affected application. | ||||
| CVE-2026-12378 | 1 Wordpress-extensions | 1 Bookingpress | 2026-11-10 | 8.1 High |
| The Appointment Booking Calendar Plugin and Scheduling Plugin WordPress plugin through 1.1.28 does not validate data before passing it to a PHP deserialization function, allowing unauthenticated attackers to inject arbitrary PHP objects; where a suitable gadget chain is present on the site this can be leveraged to achieve remote code execution. | ||||
| CVE-2026-11571 | 1 Wordpress-extensions | 1 Everest Forms | 2026-11-10 | 7.5 High |
| The Everest Forms WordPress plugin before 3.5.0 does not reliably delete temporary CSV files generated during email-notification processing and leaves them publicly accessible in the uploads directory, allowing unauthenticated attackers to retrieve other users' form submission records via predictable, enumerable filenames. | ||||
| CVE-2026-59521 | 2 Shapedplugin, Wordpress-extensions | 2 Real Testimonials, Real Testimonials | 2026-11-10 | 7.2 High |
| Deserialization of Untrusted Data vulnerability in ShapedPlugin LLC Real Testimonials testimonial-free allows Object Injection.This issue affects Real Testimonials: from n/a through <= 3.1.15. | ||||
| CVE-2026-12583 | 1 Wordpress-extensions | 1 Newsletters | 2026-11-10 | 8.1 High |
| The Newsletters WordPress plugin before 4.15 does not prevent deserialization of untrusted input that is stored through a public form, allowing unauthenticated attackers to inject a PHP object and, via a property-oriented gadget chain bundled with the Newsletters WordPress plugin before 4.15, write arbitrary files and execute code on the server. | ||||
| CVE-2026-14849 | 1 Wordpress-extensions | 1 Paid Member Subscriptions | 2026-11-10 | 3.7 Low |
| The Paid Membership Subscriptions WordPress plugin before 3.0.7 does not protect the member and payment export files it writes to a predictable location in the uploads directory, allowing unauthenticated users to download the exported member and payment data (including PII) while an export artifact is present. | ||||
| CVE-2026-12720 | 1 Wordpress-extensions | 1 Kirki | 2026-11-10 | 7.5 High |
| The Kirki WordPress plugin before 6.0.13 does not restrict which classes may be instantiated when it deserialises data that unauthenticated users can store, leading to PHP Object Injection that is triggered when an administrator later reviews the stored data. With a suitable gadget chain present on the site (via another installed Kirki WordPress plugin before 6.0.13, , or an outdated WordPress version), this could be leveraged to perform a variety of attacks, such as remote code execution. | ||||
| CVE-2026-82436 | 1 Apache | 1 Storm Client | 2026-11-10 | N/A |
| Description `DefaultStateSerializer`, used to persist and restore stateful bolt checkpoints, configured Kryo with class registration disabled and an instantiation strategy that constructs objects without invoking their constructors, then deserialized whatever bytes the state store returned. A party able to write to the topology's keyspace in the state store, for example a co-tenant of a shared Redis instance or anyone with network access to it, could therefore place a serialized object graph that executes code inside the worker JVM when the state is restored. This requires the Redis-backed state provider, which is not the default. Write access to a state-store key is a data-plane privilege; code execution in the worker JVM is not, so the two are not equivalent. Mitigation Upgrade to 3.1.0, where the state serializer requires registered classes. Note that this is a behaviour change for existing state: checkpoints written by an affected version may fail to restore, and a migration step may be required. Users who cannot upgrade immediately should restrict network and credential access to the state store to the cluster itself. Credit The ASF -- found using Claude agents to study the security of open-source projects, validated and reported by Apache Storm. | ||||
| CVE-2026-112164 | 1 Laservideo | 1 Lasergest | 2026-11-10 | N/A |
| The LaserGest mobile application encrypts stored assistance portal credentials with a hardcoded AES key and IV, allowing an attacker with access to the application package to recover them in cleartext. | ||||
| CVE-2026-121689 | 1 Frodobots | 1 Frodobots Earthrover Mini+ Firmware | 2026-11-10 | N/A |
| FrodoBots EarthRover Mini+ firmware (v6.2.4_6.2.5_0.614.0) exposes sensitive credentials through multiple insecure mechanisms. The Wi‑Fi PSK is stored in plaintext in wpa_supplicant.conf and is disclosed through unauthenticated API endpoints and diagnostic exports. Additionally, unauthenticated ADB access allows retrieval of the /etc/shadow file. | ||||
| CVE-2026-123368 | 1 Tmatens | 1 Compose-lint | 2026-11-10 | N/A |
| compose-lint is a Docker Compose security linter that identifies dangerous misconfigurations before deployment. From 0.22.0 until 0.31.0, compose-lint follows a sibling .env symbolic link outside the project without applying its normal containment check. From 0.28.0, the same gap also affects an include project_directory link outside the project. A pull request can reference a variable from the linked file, causing substitution to place runner file or process-environment data into finding messages written to logs, JSON, SARIF artifacts, and Code Scanning alerts. Reading /proc/self/environ can expose the remainder of the linter process environment because NUL-separated entries are treated as one value, although disclosure requires a workflow that processes untrusted changes with useful environment data and GitHub normally withholds secrets from fork pull requests. The pass or fail result is not changed. This issue is fixed in version 0.31.0. | ||||