Export limit exceeded: 18190 CVEs match your query. Please refine your search to export 10,000 CVEs or fewer.
Export limit exceeded: 424296 CVEs match your query. Please refine your search to export 10,000 CVEs or fewer.
Export limit exceeded: 55243 CVEs match your query. Please refine your search to export 10,000 CVEs or fewer.
Search
Search Results (55243 CVEs found)
| CVE | Vendors | Products | Updated | CVSS v3.1 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CVE-2026-66332 | 2026-11-10 | N/A | ||
| AMI APTIOV contains a vulnerability in BIOS where a privileged user may cause the “Out-of-Bound Read” by local access. Successful exploitation of this vulnerability may lead to a denial of service during firmware update processing, such as a crash or failed update if the out-of-bounds read hits unmapped memory. It could also potentially impact Confidentiality and Availability. | ||||
| CVE-2026-59986 | 2026-11-10 | 7.4 High | ||
| rabbitmq-c is a C-language AMQP client library for RabbitMQ. Prior to version 0.17.0, the bounds check (*offset = o + len) <= encoded.len overflows when o + len > SIZE_MAX on 32-bit systems. len is a uint32_t read from the AMQP wire as a BYTES/UTF8 field length. The overflow wraps the check to a small value that passes, producing a decoded amqp_bytes_t with a multi-GB .len pointing into a small frame buffer. This results in an out-of-bounds read of up to ~4GB of process memory on 32-bit systems (ARM, MIPS, x86 ILP32, embedded IoT AMQP clients). Enabling information disclosure or denial of service. Not exploitable on 64-bit systems where size_t is 64-bit. This issue has been patched in version 0.17.0. | ||||
| CVE-2026-18194 | 1 Ibm | 1 App Connect Enterprise | 2026-11-10 | 2.5 Low |
| IBM App Connect Enterprise 13.0.1.0 through 13.0.8.2 could allow a remote attacker to perform unauthorized actions due to missing anti-clickjacking controls. | ||||
| CVE-2026-58966 | 1 Google | 1 Android | 2026-11-10 | 8.4 High |
| In multiple functions of hppsfilter.c, there is a possible out-of-bounds write due to a stack buffer overflow. This could lead to local escalation of privilege with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation. | ||||
| CVE-2026-97402 | 2026-11-10 | N/A | ||
| In Eclipse Kura versions 3.1.0 to 5.6.2, the iBeacon and Eddystone advertisement decoders wrongly parse the AD-structure length field of an over-the-air BLE advertising payload. Any unauthenticated attacker within BLE radio range can broadcast a two-byte advertising payload that drives the Kura beacon-scanner thread into a tight infinite loop, pinning a CPU core and permanently halting beacon ingestion until the gateway is restarted. To trigger the attack, the iBeacon/Eddystone scanner component should be installed and active. By default the components are not installed or enabled. | ||||
| CVE-2026-97849 | 2026-11-10 | N/A | ||
| The embedded Derby network service ignores its configured bind address and listens on all network interfaces. When the service is enabled, a remote attacker with network access can connect to the database server and read or modify data. Users are recommended to upgrade to version 10.3.0 or 11.0.0-M2, which fix the issue. | ||||
| CVE-2026-11315 | 2026-11-10 | 4.3 Medium | ||
| A out-of-bounds read vulnerability exists in the dr_mp3 drmp3_init_internal functionality of dr_libs (version(s): 0.7.3). A specially crafted .mp3 file can lead to an out-of-bounds read. An attacker can provide a malicious file to trigger this vulnerability. | ||||
| CVE-2026-125758 | 2026-11-10 | 7.4 High | ||
| Aptabase before commit 61d4c01 contains an authentication bypass vulnerability that allows unauthenticated attackers to forge sign-in links by using the publicly known example AUTH_SECRET. Attackers can enumerate registered e-mails via /api/_auth/signin, forge HS256 JWTs redeemed by /api/_auth/continue, impersonate users, export analytics data, and transfer app ownership. | ||||
| CVE-2026-125757 | 1 Mailcow | 1 Mailcow\ | 2026-11-10 | 9.1 Critical |
| mailcow: dockerized before 2026-11 contains a server-side template injection vulnerability that allows domain administrators to execute commands in the shared rspamd container by storing a malicious domain-wide footer. Attackers can embed a Jinja macro with an os.execute default value, rendered by the rspamd MOO_FOOTER prefilter, to read or inject mail for every tenant and disable filtering. | ||||
| CVE-2026-111249 | 2026-11-10 | N/A | ||
| The development-time LiveReload support listens on all network interfaces without authentication and accepts websocket connections from any origin. A network attacker, or a web page visited by the developer, can observe the names of changed files in the watched folder and the server version, and reach the deployed applications through the additional port. This only affects LiveReload enabled in the embedded Maven plugin. Users are recommended to upgrade to version 10.3.0 or 11.0.0-M2, which fix the issue. | ||||
| CVE-2026-111257 | 2026-11-10 | N/A | ||
| With the default configuration and no users defined in the default user database, TomEE silently adds an administrative user with a well-known password at startup. A remote attacker can use these credentials to authenticate to web applications that use the default realm and grant access to any authenticated user or to the TomEE administrative role. Users are recommended to upgrade to version 10.3.0 or 11.0.0-M2, which fix the issue. | ||||
| CVE-2026-103854 | 3 Adobe, Apple, Microsoft | 3 Dimension, Macos, Windows | 2026-11-10 | 7.8 High |
| Dimension is affected by a Stack-based Buffer Overflow vulnerability that could result in arbitrary code execution in the context of the current user. Exploitation of this issue requires user interaction in that a victim must open a malicious file. | ||||
| CVE-2026-103853 | 3 Adobe, Apple, Microsoft | 3 Dimension, Macos, Windows | 2026-11-10 | 5.5 Medium |
| Dimension is affected by an out-of-bounds read vulnerability that could lead to disclosure of sensitive memory. An attacker could leverage this vulnerability to disclose sensitive information. Exploitation of this issue requires user interaction in that a victim must open a malicious file. | ||||
| CVE-2026-103851 | 3 Adobe, Apple, Microsoft | 3 Substance 3d Stager, Macos, Windows | 2026-11-10 | 7.8 High |
| Substance3D - Stager is affected by a Stack-based Buffer Overflow vulnerability that could result in arbitrary code execution in the context of the current user. Exploitation of this issue requires user interaction in that a victim must open a malicious file. | ||||
| CVE-2026-103850 | 3 Adobe, Apple, Microsoft | 3 Substance 3d Stager, Macos, Windows | 2026-11-10 | 5.5 Medium |
| Substance3D - Stager is affected by an out-of-bounds read vulnerability that could lead to disclosure of sensitive memory. An attacker could leverage this vulnerability to disclose sensitive information. Exploitation of this issue requires user interaction in that a victim must open a malicious file. | ||||
| CVE-2024-5535 | 5 Debian, Netapp, Openssl and 2 more | 72 Debian Linux, 500f, 500f Firmware and 69 more | 2026-11-10 | 9.1 Critical |
| Issue summary: Calling the OpenSSL API function SSL_select_next_proto with an empty supported client protocols buffer may cause a crash or memory contents to be sent to the peer. Impact summary: A buffer overread can have a range of potential consequences such as unexpected application beahviour or a crash. In particular this issue could result in up to 255 bytes of arbitrary private data from memory being sent to the peer leading to a loss of confidentiality. However, only applications that directly call the SSL_select_next_proto function with a 0 length list of supported client protocols are affected by this issue. This would normally never be a valid scenario and is typically not under attacker control but may occur by accident in the case of a configuration or programming error in the calling application. The OpenSSL API function SSL_select_next_proto is typically used by TLS applications that support ALPN (Application Layer Protocol Negotiation) or NPN (Next Protocol Negotiation). NPN is older, was never standardised and is deprecated in favour of ALPN. We believe that ALPN is significantly more widely deployed than NPN. The SSL_select_next_proto function accepts a list of protocols from the server and a list of protocols from the client and returns the first protocol that appears in the server list that also appears in the client list. In the case of no overlap between the two lists it returns the first item in the client list. In either case it will signal whether an overlap between the two lists was found. In the case where SSL_select_next_proto is called with a zero length client list it fails to notice this condition and returns the memory immediately following the client list pointer (and reports that there was no overlap in the lists). This function is typically called from a server side application callback for ALPN or a client side application callback for NPN. In the case of ALPN the list of protocols supplied by the client is guaranteed by libssl to never be zero in length. The list of server protocols comes from the application and should never normally be expected to be of zero length. In this case if the SSL_select_next_proto function has been called as expected (with the list supplied by the client passed in the client/client_len parameters), then the application will not be vulnerable to this issue. If the application has accidentally been configured with a zero length server list, and has accidentally passed that zero length server list in the client/client_len parameters, and has additionally failed to correctly handle a "no overlap" response (which would normally result in a handshake failure in ALPN) then it will be vulnerable to this problem. In the case of NPN, the protocol permits the client to opportunistically select a protocol when there is no overlap. OpenSSL returns the first client protocol in the no overlap case in support of this. The list of client protocols comes from the application and should never normally be expected to be of zero length. However if the SSL_select_next_proto function is accidentally called with a client_len of 0 then an invalid memory pointer will be returned instead. If the application uses this output as the opportunistic protocol then the loss of confidentiality will occur. This issue has been assessed as Low severity because applications are most likely to be vulnerable if they are using NPN instead of ALPN - but NPN is not widely used. It also requires an application configuration or programming error. Finally, this issue would not typically be under attacker control making active exploitation unlikely. The FIPS modules in 3.3, 3.2, 3.1 and 3.0 are not affected by this issue. Due to the low severity of this issue we are not issuing new releases of OpenSSL at this time. The fix will be included in the next releases when they become available. | ||||
| CVE-2026-69005 | 1 Samsung Semiconductor | 6 Exynos 1480, Exynos 1580, Exynos 1680 and 3 more | 2026-11-10 | 7.3 High |
| Integer overflow in NPU driver parameter processing due to insufficient bounds checking. | ||||
| CVE-2026-68984 | 1 Samsung Semiconductor | 10 Exynos 1280, Exynos 1380, Exynos 1480 and 7 more | 2026-11-10 | 8.1 High |
| In the Samsung Exynos NPU kernel driver, an integer overflow allows an unprivileged application to trigger memory corruption. | ||||
| CVE-2026-48179 | 1 Samsung Semiconductor | 5 Exynos 1080, Exynos 9110, Exynos Modem 5123 and 2 more | 2026-11-10 | 7.5 High |
| In the Exynos modem's IMS stack, improper handling of SDP payload leads to a Denial of Service | ||||
| CVE-2026-48176 | 1 Samsung Semiconductor | 5 Exynos 1080, Exynos 9110, Exynos Modem 5123 and 2 more | 2026-11-10 | 7.5 High |
| A memory corruption vulnerability caused by improper validation of messages | ||||