Export limit exceeded: 424637 CVEs match your query. Please refine your search to export 10,000 CVEs or fewer.
Export limit exceeded: 12023 CVEs match your query. Please refine your search to export 10,000 CVEs or fewer.
Export limit exceeded: 424637 CVEs match your query. Please refine your search to export 10,000 CVEs or fewer.
Search
Search Results (424637 CVEs found)
| CVE | Vendors | Products | Updated | CVSS v3.1 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CVE-2026-12427 | 2026-11-11 | 7.2 High | ||
| The ARforms plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Stored Cross-Site Scripting via the 'description' parameter in all versions up to, and including, 7.2.4 due to insufficient input sanitization and output escaping. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to inject arbitrary web scripts in pages that will execute whenever a user accesses an injected page. The injected payload is deserialized via maybe_unserialize() when an administrator views the affected entry; if the attacker's array contains a 'referrer' key, the attacker-controlled page_url and http_referrer values are used as-is and rendered unescaped into the admin entry detail view. | ||||
| CVE-2026-12424 | 2026-11-11 | 7.2 High | ||
| The ARforms plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Stored Cross-Site Scripting via Referer Header in all versions up to, and including, 7.2.4 due to insufficient input sanitization and output escaping. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to inject arbitrary web scripts in pages that will execute whenever a user accesses an injected page. The arf_save_incomplete_form_data() AJAX handler is registered with wp_ajax_nopriv_, meaning unauthenticated attackers can store a malicious payload by submitting a partial form entry with a forged Referer header, with no authentication required at any step. | ||||
| CVE-2026-15785 | 2026-11-11 | 6.1 Medium | ||
| The Joinchat – Enhanced "click to chat" plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Reflected Cross-Site Scripting via '{HREF}' Dynamic Variable via Query Parameter Name in all versions up to, and including, 6.3.1 due to insufficient input sanitization and output escaping. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to inject arbitrary web scripts in pages that execute if they can successfully trick a user into performing an action such as clicking on a link. Exploitation requires that an administrator has configured a telephone number and included the {HREF} dynamic variable in the Call-to-Action text. | ||||
| CVE-2026-93487 | 2026-11-11 | N/A | ||
| In affected versions of Octopus Server, incorrect validation of the permissions assigned to a user that would allow them to create project triggers could result in the user being able to run runbooks or create deployments they were not authorised to perform. | ||||
| CVE-2026-96414 | 2026-11-11 | N/A | ||
| In affected versions of Octopus Server, insufficient integrity protection of authentication cookies, combined with incorrect validation of permissions assigned to a user that allowed them to view users or audit events, could result in the user escalating their privileges to those of an Administrator. | ||||
| CVE-2026-121837 | 1 Redhat | 3 Build Of Quarkus, Exploit Intelligence, Quarkus | 2026-11-11 | 4.3 Medium |
| A flaw was found in the REST Data Panache component of Quarkus. When a security constraint is applied to an entity property using the @SecureField annotation on its getter method rather than the field itself, the generated REST resource fails to enforce this constraint for filtering and sorting operations. This allows an authenticated user to infer sensitive data values by observing which records match specific filter criteria or how they are ordered, even though the values are omitted from the final response. | ||||
| CVE-2026-18912 | 1 Zohocorp | 2 Datasecurity Plus, Manageengine Datasecurity Plus | 2026-11-11 | 8.1 High |
| Zoho Corporation ManageEngine DataSecurity Plus versions below 6310 are vulnerable to an authenticated SQL injection vulnerability in reports module where an authenticated technician could execute arbitrary SQL queries. | ||||
| CVE-2026-112315 | 2 Red Hat, Redhat | 5 Enterprise Linux, Enterprise Linux, Hardened Images and 2 more | 2026-11-11 | 5.3 Medium |
| The RPCSEC_GSS authentication routines in lib/rpc/authgss_prot.c in MIT Kerberos 5 (aka krb5) 1.4 and later do not free partially decoded buffers on failure, which allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (memory leak in kadmind) via crafted RPCSEC_GSS messages. | ||||
| CVE-2026-55653 | 3 Openbsd, Openssh, Redhat | 13 Openssh, Openssh, Enterprise Linux and 10 more | 2026-11-11 | 4.3 Medium |
| A flaw was found in OpenSSH. A malicious SSH server can exploit a double free vulnerability in the Diffie-Hellman Group Exchange (DH-GEX) client path. This occurs during FIPS (Federal Information Processing Standards) mode known-group validation when the client processes attacker-controlled DH-GEX group parameters. Successful exploitation leads to client-side process termination, resulting in a Denial of Service (DoS). | ||||
| CVE-2026-123656 | 2026-11-11 | N/A | ||
| The ProfilePress WordPress plugin before 4.17.6 does not correctly evaluate some of its content protection rule conditions when content is rendered outside the main query, allowing unauthenticated users to read the content of pages protected by such rules via the REST API. | ||||
| CVE-2026-42784 | 3 Red Hat, Redhat, Sequoia-pgp | 15 Enterprise Linux, Ansible Automation Platform, Ansible Automation Platform Developer and 12 more | 2026-11-11 | 7.4 High |
| A flaw was found in sequoia-openpgp. The library incorrectly infers key flags for older certificates when a key flags subpacket is missing, leading to a discrepancy in how key capabilities are viewed. This key flag confusion allows an attacker to bypass the back-signature check. Consequently, an attacker can illegitimately bind an arbitrary subkey to their own certificate and forge signatures, completely compromising cryptographic integrity. | ||||
| CVE-2026-114406 | 1 Redhat | 26 Advanced Cluster Security, Agentic Cluster Security Suite, Ai Inference Server and 23 more | 2026-11-11 | 6.8 Medium |
| The system certificate authority (CA) store in Red Hat products, distributed via ca-certificates RPM packages, included multiple root CA certificates of authorities, which signed intermediate CA certificates with weak private keys issued by the eMudhra certificate authority. A man-in-the-middle attacker could use this flaw to issue certificates for arbitrary host names signed by the weak intermediate CA certificates, which would be considered trusted by a TLS/SSL client using system CA store and cause such clients to connect to malicious sites. Due to inability to only distrust specific intermediate certificates in all clients using the system CA store, root CA certificates of authorities that signed weak intermediate CA certificates are being removed. | ||||
| CVE-2026-118368 | 1 Akaunting | 1 Akaunting | 2026-11-11 | N/A |
| Akaunting 3.3.0 contains a stored cross-site scripting vulnerability in the XLSX item-import workflow. An authenticated Manager can import an item whose name contains HTML. When another authenticated user selects that item while creating a document, Akaunting places the stored name in an invoice or bill line item through Vue v-html, causing attacker-controlled markup to execute in the victim's Akaunting origin. | ||||
| CVE-2026-59191 | 2026-11-11 | N/A | ||
| TwigView plugin for CakePHP provides wrappers for common View operations and extensions that expose CakePHP functions and jasny/twig-extensions helpers. Prior to versions 1.3.3 and 2.1.2, if FileLoader::findTemplate() is supplied un-validated user controlled data, arbitrary files can be read. This issue has been patched in versions 1.3.3 and 2.1.2. | ||||
| CVE-2026-59192 | 2026-11-11 | N/A | ||
| TwigView plugin for CakePHP provides wrappers for common View operations and extensions that expose CakePHP functions and jasny/twig-extensions helpers. Prior to versions 1.3.3 and 2.1.2, the unserialize filter has no restriction on which classes are allowed. This can used as a deserialization remote-code-execution gadget. This issue has been patched in versions 1.3.3 and 2.1.2. | ||||
| CVE-2026-61810 | 2026-11-11 | N/A | ||
| libspdm is a sample implementation that follows the DMTF SPDM specifications. In version 1.4.0, both the FINISH request (Table 80) and the FINISH_RSP response (Table 81) gained two new fields, OpaqueDataLength and OpaqueData, placed before the trailing signed/authenticated field. The transcript definitions used to compute and verify the FINISH signature, the FINISH HMAC (RequesterVerifyData), and the FINISH_RSP HMAC (ResponderVerifyData) were not updated and still terminate with a step of the form. Per DSP0274, the "SPDM Header Fields" are only the four header bytes (SPDMVersion, RequestResponseCode, Param1, Param2). A literal reading therefore excludes OpaqueDataLength and OpaqueData, even though those fields are transmitted before the trailing signature/HMAC field. Because the signature/HMAC must cover every field transmitted before it to "protect the entire handshake against manipulation by an active attacker," an active attacker could otherwise modify the opaque data in flight without invalidating the signature or HMAC. This issue has been patched in version 1.4.1. | ||||
| CVE-2026-64686 | 2026-11-11 | 5 Medium | ||
| OpenSearch Dashboards is an open-source data visualization tool designed to work with OpenSearch. From versions 2.14.0 to before 2.19.6, and 3.0.0 to before 3.7.0, a Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability in OpenSearch Dashboards exists in the fetchDataSourceMetaData route. The sibling test_connection route validates incoming endpoint URLs via isValidURL() against configured endpointDeniedIPs and endpointAllowlistedSuffixes lists, but fetchDataSourceMetaData accepts the same input shape without performing this validation. An authenticated user can supply an internal or loopback endpoint to probe internal network resources. This issue has been patched in versions 2.19.6 and 3.7.0. | ||||
| CVE-2026-64678 | 2026-11-11 | 9.8 Critical | ||
| NOsql Object (NO2 a.k.a Nitrite) database is an open source nosql embedded document store. Prior to version 4.4.1, when Nitrite opens a database file, MVStoreUtils.openOrCreate() automatically checks for a legacy v1-format store and, on detecting one (or hitting a compatibility error while opening), triggers an automatic migration path. This path deserializes stored values using NitriteDataType.deserialize(byte[]), which passes the raw bytes directly to java.io.ObjectInputStream.readObject() via a custom NitriteObjectInputStream subclass. That subclass overrides only readClassDescriptor() — solely to remap a handful of known legacy class names to their current equivalents — and implements no class allowlist, blocklist, or ObjectInputFilter (JEP 290). Any Serializable class reachable on the embedding application's classpath can therefore be instantiated via readObject(), with readObject()/readExternal()/readResolve() callbacks invoked unconditionally. If a suitable gadget class (e.g. from commons-collections or similar) happens to be present on the classpath, this is a precondition for remote code execution. This issue has been patched in version 4.4.1. | ||||
| CVE-2026-64682 | 2026-11-11 | 9.8 Critical | ||
| AstroBlocks is a block-first CMS for Astro projects. Prior to version 3.4.0, admin session tokens can be forged due to a hard-coded fallback JWT secret and a mismatched environment variable name. An attacker who knows the public fallback value (readable in the published package) can forge a valid session token with role: "owner" and obtain full administrative control of the CMS — creating/deleting content, users, media, redirects, and configuration. This issue has been patched in version 3.4.0. | ||||
| CVE-2026-26248 | 1 Fortinet | 3 Fortisandbox, Fortisandboxcloud, Fortisandboxpaas | 2026-11-11 | 7.9 High |
| A improper neutralization of input during web page generation ('cross-site scripting') vulnerability in Fortinet FortiSandbox 5.0.0 through 5.0.5, FortiSandbox 4.4.0 through 4.4.8, FortiSandbox 4.2 all versions, FortiSandbox Cloud 5.0.4 through 5.0.5, FortiSandbox PaaS 5.0.4 through 5.0.5 may allow an unauthenticated attacker to perform an XSS attack via social engineering and crafted HTTP requests. | ||||