Search Results (606 CVEs found)

CVE Vendors Products Updated CVSS v3.1
CVE-2019-9169 5 Canonical, Gnu, Mcafee and 2 more 7 Ubuntu Linux, Glibc, Web Gateway and 4 more 2026-10-14 9.8 Critical
In the GNU C Library (aka glibc or libc6) through 2.29, proceed_next_node in posix/regexec.c has a heap-based buffer over-read via an attempted case-insensitive regular-expression match.
CVE-2019-16168 9 Canonical, Debian, Fedoraproject and 6 more 21 Ubuntu Linux, Debian Linux, Fedora and 18 more 2026-10-14 6.5 Medium
In SQLite through 3.29.0, whereLoopAddBtreeIndex in sqlite3.c can crash a browser or other application because of missing validation of a sqlite_stat1 sz field, aka a "severe division by zero in the query planner."
CVE-2019-13057 7 Apple, Canonical, Debian and 4 more 9 Mac Os X, Ubuntu Linux, Debian Linux and 6 more 2026-10-14 4.9 Medium
An issue was discovered in the server in OpenLDAP before 2.4.48. When the server administrator delegates rootDN (database admin) privileges for certain databases but wants to maintain isolation (e.g., for multi-tenant deployments), slapd does not properly stop a rootDN from requesting authorization as an identity from another database during a SASL bind or with a proxyAuthz (RFC 4370) control. (It is not a common configuration to deploy a system where the server administrator and a DB administrator enjoy different levels of trust.)
CVE-2004-0230 7 Juniper, Mcafee, Microsoft and 4 more 12 Junos, Network Data Loss Prevention, Windows 2000 and 9 more 2026-10-09 N/A
TCP, when using a large Window Size, makes it easier for remote attackers to guess sequence numbers and cause a denial of service (connection loss) to persistent TCP connections by repeatedly injecting a TCP RST packet, especially in protocols that use long-lived connections, such as BGP.
CVE-2021-3449 13 Checkpoint, Debian, Fedoraproject and 10 more 172 Multi-domain Management, Multi-domain Management Firmware, Quantum Security Gateway and 169 more 2026-10-08 5.9 Medium
An OpenSSL TLS server may crash if sent a maliciously crafted renegotiation ClientHello message from a client. If a TLSv1.2 renegotiation ClientHello omits the signature_algorithms extension (where it was present in the initial ClientHello), but includes a signature_algorithms_cert extension then a NULL pointer dereference will result, leading to a crash and a denial of service attack. A server is only vulnerable if it has TLSv1.2 and renegotiation enabled (which is the default configuration). OpenSSL TLS clients are not impacted by this issue. All OpenSSL 1.1.1 versions are affected by this issue. Users of these versions should upgrade to OpenSSL 1.1.1k. OpenSSL 1.0.2 is not impacted by this issue. Fixed in OpenSSL 1.1.1k (Affected 1.1.1-1.1.1j).
CVE-2021-33037 5 Apache, Debian, Mcafee and 2 more 25 Tomcat, Tomee, Debian Linux and 22 more 2026-10-08 5.3 Medium
Apache Tomcat 10.0.0-M1 to 10.0.6, 9.0.0.M1 to 9.0.46 and 8.5.0 to 8.5.66 did not correctly parse the HTTP transfer-encoding request header in some circumstances leading to the possibility to request smuggling when used with a reverse proxy. Specifically: - Tomcat incorrectly ignored the transfer encoding header if the client declared it would only accept an HTTP/1.0 response; - Tomcat honoured the identify encoding; and - Tomcat did not ensure that, if present, the chunked encoding was the final encoding.
CVE-2021-3450 11 Fedoraproject, Freebsd, Mcafee and 8 more 39 Fedora, Freebsd, Web Gateway and 36 more 2026-10-08 7.4 High
The X509_V_FLAG_X509_STRICT flag enables additional security checks of the certificates present in a certificate chain. It is not set by default. Starting from OpenSSL version 1.1.1h a check to disallow certificates in the chain that have explicitly encoded elliptic curve parameters was added as an additional strict check. An error in the implementation of this check meant that the result of a previous check to confirm that certificates in the chain are valid CA certificates was overwritten. This effectively bypasses the check that non-CA certificates must not be able to issue other certificates. If a "purpose" has been configured then there is a subsequent opportunity for checks that the certificate is a valid CA. All of the named "purpose" values implemented in libcrypto perform this check. Therefore, where a purpose is set the certificate chain will still be rejected even when the strict flag has been used. A purpose is set by default in libssl client and server certificate verification routines, but it can be overridden or removed by an application. In order to be affected, an application must explicitly set the X509_V_FLAG_X509_STRICT verification flag and either not set a purpose for the certificate verification or, in the case of TLS client or server applications, override the default purpose. OpenSSL versions 1.1.1h and newer are affected by this issue. Users of these versions should upgrade to OpenSSL 1.1.1k. OpenSSL 1.0.2 is not impacted by this issue. Fixed in OpenSSL 1.1.1k (Affected 1.1.1h-1.1.1j).
CVE-2020-9484 8 Apache, Canonical, Debian and 5 more 30 Tomcat, Ubuntu Linux, Debian Linux and 27 more 2026-10-08 7.0 High
When using Apache Tomcat versions 10.0.0-M1 to 10.0.0-M4, 9.0.0.M1 to 9.0.34, 8.5.0 to 8.5.54 and 7.0.0 to 7.0.103 if a) an attacker is able to control the contents and name of a file on the server; and b) the server is configured to use the PersistenceManager with a FileStore; and c) the PersistenceManager is configured with sessionAttributeValueClassNameFilter="null" (the default unless a SecurityManager is used) or a sufficiently lax filter to allow the attacker provided object to be deserialized; and d) the attacker knows the relative file path from the storage location used by FileStore to the file the attacker has control over; then, using a specifically crafted request, the attacker will be able to trigger remote code execution via deserialization of the file under their control. Note that all of conditions a) to d) must be true for the attack to succeed.
CVE-2020-13935 8 Apache, Canonical, Debian and 5 more 23 Tomcat, Ubuntu Linux, Debian Linux and 20 more 2026-10-08 7.5 High
The payload length in a WebSocket frame was not correctly validated in Apache Tomcat 10.0.0-M1 to 10.0.0-M6, 9.0.0.M1 to 9.0.36, 8.5.0 to 8.5.56 and 7.0.27 to 7.0.104. Invalid payload lengths could trigger an infinite loop. Multiple requests with invalid payload lengths could lead to a denial of service.
CVE-2016-4472 4 Canonical, Libexpat Project, Mcafee and 1 more 4 Ubuntu Linux, Libexpat, Policy Auditor and 1 more 2026-10-08 8.1 High
The overflow protection in Expat is removed by compilers with certain optimization settings, which allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (crash) or possibly execute arbitrary code via crafted XML data. NOTE: this vulnerability exists because of an incomplete fix for CVE-2015-1283 and CVE-2015-2716.
CVE-2016-0718 10 Apple, Canonical, Debian and 7 more 16 Mac Os X, Ubuntu Linux, Debian Linux and 13 more 2026-10-08 9.8 Critical
Expat allows context-dependent attackers to cause a denial of service (crash) or possibly execute arbitrary code via a malformed input document, which triggers a buffer overflow.
CVE-2008-7020 1 Mcafee 1 Safeboot Device Encryption 2026-04-23 N/A
McAfee SafeBoot Device Encryption 4 build 4750 and earlier stores pre-boot authentication passwords in the BIOS Keyboard buffer and does not clear this buffer after use, which allows local users to obtain sensitive information by reading the physical memory locations associated with this buffer.
CVE-2007-1498 1 Mcafee 2 Epolicy Orchestrator, Protectionpilot 2026-04-23 N/A
Multiple stack-based buffer overflows in the SiteManager.SiteMgr.1 ActiveX control (SiteManager.dll) in the ePO management console in McAfee ePolicy Orchestrator (ePO) before 3.6.1 Patch 1 and ProtectionPilot (PRP) before 1.5.0 HotFix allow remote attackers to execute arbitrary code via a long argument to the (1) ExportSiteList and (2) VerifyPackageCatalog functions, and (3) unspecified vectors involving a swprintf function call.
CVE-2009-1491 2 Mcafee, Microsoft 2 Groupshield, Exchange Server 2026-04-23 N/A
McAfee GroupShield for Microsoft Exchange on Exchange Server 2000, and possibly other anti-virus or anti-spam products from McAfee or other vendors, does not scan X- headers for malicious content, which allows remote attackers to bypass virus detection via a crafted message, as demonstrated by a message with an X-Testing header and no message body.
CVE-2008-3605 1 Mcafee 1 Encrypted Usb Manager 2026-04-23 N/A
Unspecified vulnerability in McAfee Encrypted USB Manager 3.1.0.0, when the Re-use Threshold for passwords is nonzero, allows remote attackers to conduct offline brute force attacks via unknown vectors.
CVE-2006-5274 1 Mcafee 3 Common Management Agent, Epolicy Orchestrator, Protectionpilot 2026-04-23 N/A
Integer overflow in McAfee ePolicy Orchestrator 3.5 through 3.6.1, ProtectionPilot 1.1.1 and 1.5, and Common Management Agent (CMA) 3.5.5.438 allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (CMA Framework service crash) and possibly execute arbitrary code via unspecified vectors.
CVE-2009-2312 1 Mcafee 1 Smartfilter 2026-04-23 N/A
SmartFilter Web Gateway Security 4.2.1.00 stores user credentials in cleartext in config.txt and uses insecure permissions for this file, which allows local users to gain privileges.
CVE-2008-0127 1 Mcafee 1 E-business Server 2026-04-23 N/A
The administration interface in McAfee E-Business Server 8.5.2 and earlier allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (crash) and execute arbitrary code via a long initial authentication packet.
CVE-2008-1855 1 Mcafee 1 Cma 2026-04-23 N/A
FrameworkService.exe in McAfee Common Management Agent (CMA) 3.6.0.574 Patch 3 and earlier, as used by ePolicy Orchestrator (ePO) and ProtectionPilot (PrP), allows remote attackers to corrupt memory and cause a denial of service (CMA Framework service crash) via a long invalid method in requests for the /spin//AVClient//AVClient.csp URI, a different vulnerability than CVE-2006-5274.
CVE-2009-2429 1 Mcafee 1 Smartfilter 2026-04-23 N/A
SmartFilter Web Gateway Security 4.2.1.00 stores user credentials in cleartext in admin_backup.xml files and uses insecure permissions for these files, which allows local users to gain privileges. NOTE: the provenance of this information is unknown; the details are obtained solely from third party information.